Emanuela Mutti

874 citations
17 papers · 697 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Emanuela Mutti

17 papers receiving 669 citations

Peers

Emanuela Mutti
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 541
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 72
  • Surgery 166
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 14
  • Neurology 48
Replace Robert Deegan with:
Robert Deegan United States
F. Kerr United Kingdom
Tony Reybrouck Belgium
Barbara A. Osikowska United Kingdom
Poul Ebbe Nielsen Denmark
Ilja Guelen Netherlands
M O Hassan United Kingdom
Lysander W. J. Bogert Netherlands
Daniele Malaspina Italy
Maria Luisa Stella Italy
Emanuela Mutti relative to Robert Deegan United States Robert Deegan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
Robert Deegan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emanuela Mutti

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emanuela Mutti's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emanuela Mutti with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emanuela Mutti more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emanuela Mutti

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emanuela Mutti. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emanuela Mutti. The network helps show where Emanuela Mutti may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Emanuela Mutti, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emanuela Mutti Line = papers co-authored together Emanuela Mutti links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 1993199
2 1991127
3 199078
4 199258
5 199154
6 199437
7 199030
8 198927
9
Advantages and disadvantages of non-invasive ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.
199027
10 199427
11 199210
12
24-h ambulatory non-invasive blood pressure monitoring in the assessment of the antihypertensive action of celiprolol.
19886
13 19966
14 19894
15 19913
16 19892
17 19892

About Emanuela Mutti

Emanuela Mutti is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Biochemistry and Analytical Chemistry, having authored 17 papers that have together received 697 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (12 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (9 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (3 papers), Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension (2 papers), Eicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology (2 papers), Cardiac Health and Mental Health (2 papers), Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring (2 papers) and Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (541 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (72 citations), Surgery (166 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (14 citations) and Neurology (48 citations). Emanuela Mutti has collaborated with scholars based in Italy and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Gianfranco Parati, Giuseppe Mancia, Silvia Trazzi, Stefano Omboni, A. Frattola, Paolo Castiglioni, Marco Di Rienzo, Ben P.M. Imholz, Antonella Ravogli and Alessandra Villani. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Hypertension, Hypertension, Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, The American Journal of Medicine and Clinical and Experimental Hypertension Part A Theory and Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact