Elsebeth Stenager

2.9k citations
107 papers · 1.9k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Elsebeth Stenager

92 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Elsebeth Stenager
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Clinical Psychology 731
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 349
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 194
  • Biological Psychiatry 27
  • Rehabilitation 59
Replace Samuel F. Mikail with:
Samuel F. Mikail Canada
Riccardo Torta Italy
Kathryn Nicholson Perry Australia
María Isabel Peralta‐Ramírez Spain
Gioia Mura Italy
Loyola McLean Australia
Inger Sandanger Norway
Janet Williams United Kingdom
Marco Rigatelli Italy
Gereon Heuft Germany
Elsebeth Stenager relative to Samuel F. Mikail Canada Samuel F. Mikail's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.8×
Samuel F. Mikail · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Elsebeth Stenager

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Elsebeth Stenager's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elsebeth Stenager with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elsebeth Stenager more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Elsebeth Stenager

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elsebeth Stenager. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elsebeth Stenager. The network helps show where Elsebeth Stenager may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Elsebeth Stenager, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Elsebeth Stenager Line = papers co-authored together Elsebeth Stenager links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 107 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015146
2 1998112
3 2017106
4 2020103
5 201586
6 201884
7 199271
8 201569
9 201364
10 201954
11 199446
12 201744
13 201541
14 201039
15 199238
16 201637
17 201235
18
Attempted suicide, suicidal intent, and alcohol.
199331
19 202029
20 201328

About Elsebeth Stenager

Elsebeth Stenager is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Social Psychology and Epidemiology, having authored 107 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (31 papers), Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (9 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (9 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (9 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (8 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (7 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (6 papers) and Eating Disorders and Behaviors (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (731 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (349 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (194 citations), Biological Psychiatry (27 citations) and Rehabilitation (59 citations). Elsebeth Stenager has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, United States and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Egon Stenager, Annette Erlangsen, Yeates Conwell, Angelina Isabella Mellentin, Erik Christiansen, Jesper L. Boldsen, Claus Madsen, Anette Søgaard Nielsen, Merete Nordentoft and Carsten Bogh Juhl. Their work appears in journals such as European Psychiatry, International Journal of Social Psychiatry, BMC Medical Ethics, Multiple Sclerosis Journal and Journal of Psychosomatic Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact