Ellen Oxfeld
Impact in
- Demography top 5%
- Diaspora, migration, transnational identity
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Migration and Labor Dynamics
- Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy
- Chinese history and philosophy
- Migration, Refugees, and Integration
- Vietnamese History and Culture Studies
Papers in
-
- Chinese history and philosophy 6
- Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy 4
- Social and Cultural Dynamics 1
-
- China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance 2
- South Asian Studies and Conflicts 1
- Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East 1
Ellen Oxfeld
13 papers receiving 230 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Demography 83
- Sociology and Political Science 221
- Anthropology 32
- Political Science and International Relations 71
- Management of Technology and Innovation 15
Countries citing papers authored by Ellen Oxfeld
This map shows the geographic impact of Ellen Oxfeld's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ellen Oxfeld with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ellen Oxfeld more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ellen Oxfeld
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ellen Oxfeld. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ellen Oxfeld. The network helps show where Ellen Oxfeld may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 2 scholars most cited alongside Ellen Oxfeld, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2004 | 96 | |
| 2 | 1994 | 71 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 30 | |
| 4 | 1992 | 20 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 19 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 12 | |
| 7 | 2004 | 12 | |
| 8 | 2007 | 9 | |
| 9 | Bitter and Sweet: Food, Meaning, and Modernity in Rural China | 2017 | 6 |
| 10 | 2019 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2001 | 4 | |
| 12 | [Blood, Sweat & Mahjong: Family & Enterprise in an Overseas Chinese Community] | 1997 | 1 |
| 13 | 1999 | 1 | |
| 14 | Chinese in India | 2006 | 1 |
About Ellen Oxfeld
Ellen Oxfeld is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Finance, Cultural Studies and Philosophy, having authored 14 papers that have together received 287 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chinese history and philosophy (6 papers), Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (4 papers), China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (2 papers), Social and Cultural Dynamics (1 paper), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (1 paper), South Asian Studies and Conflicts (1 paper), South Asian Studies and Diaspora (1 paper) and Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Demography (83 citations), Sociology and Political Science (221 citations), Anthropology (32 citations), Political Science and International Relations (71 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (15 citations). Ellen Oxfeld has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Lynellyn D. Long and Timothy P. Fong. Their work appears in journals such as International Migration Review, Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, The Journal of Asian Studies, American Anthropologist and Cultural Anthropology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.