Ellen M. Thoms

23 papers receiving 282 citations

Peers

Ellen M. Thoms
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
  • Insect Science 187
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 168
  • Genetics 191
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 41
  • Plant Science 91
Replace Karen M. Vail with:
Karen M. Vail United States
Clay W. Scherer United States
Imran Bodlah Pakistan
Julian R. Yates United States
Katsuya Ichinose Japan
Albert Greene United States
Denise Dolores Oliveira Moreira Brazil
Dihego Oliveira Azevedo Brazil
José Manuel Latorre-Estivalis Brazil
Susan V. Gruner United States
Ellen M. Thoms relative to Karen M. Vail United States Karen M. Vail's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Karen M. Vail · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ellen M. Thoms

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ellen M. Thoms's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ellen M. Thoms with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ellen M. Thoms more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ellen M. Thoms

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ellen M. Thoms. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ellen M. Thoms. The network helps show where Ellen M. Thoms may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ellen M. Thoms, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ellen M. Thoms Line = papers co-authored together Ellen M. Thoms links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199543
2 201642
3 201232
4 198423
5 200120
6 200920
7 200619
8 198617
9 199515
10 198615
11 201414
12 199911
13 201010
14 20009
15 19876
16 20144
17 19874
18
A novel, localized treatment using spinosad to control structural infestations of drywood termites (Isoptera: Kalotermitidae).
19994
19 19873
20 20202

About Ellen M. Thoms

Ellen M. Thoms is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Insect Science, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Plant Science, having authored 23 papers that have together received 318 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (14 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (13 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (12 papers), Insects and Parasite Interactions (7 papers), Insect Pest Control Strategies (4 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (2 papers), Animal and Plant Science Education (2 papers) and Forest Insect Ecology and Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (187 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (168 citations), Genetics (191 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (41 citations) and Plant Science (91 citations). Ellen M. Thoms has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Malaysia and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Rudolf H. Scheffrahn, William H. Robinson, Thomas W. Phillips, Brian J. Cabrera, Paul M. Ban, Mark E. Payton, Nan‐Yao Su, George Opit, T. F. Watson and Matthew T. Messenger. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Economic Entomology, Environmental Entomology, Journal of Zoology, Journal of Invertebrate Pathology and Florida Entomologist.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact