Ellen Bible
Impact in
- Developmental Neuroscience top 5%
- Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
- Physiology top 5%
- Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research
Papers in
-
- Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research 6
-
- RNA regulation and disease 2
- Co-authors
- Jonathan D. Cooper (6 shared papers)Michel Modo (4 shared papers)David Chau (3 shared papers)Kevin M. Shakesheff (3 shared papers)Morgan R. Alexander (3 shared papers)Praveena Gupta (3 shared papers)Megan A. Griffey (3 shared papers)Mark S. Sands (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Nature Reviews Neurology (10 papers)Nature Reviews Nephrology (4 papers)Biomaterials (3 papers)Neurobiology of Disease (3 papers)Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesBelgium
In The Last Decade
Ellen Bible
23 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Developmental Neuroscience 133
- Physiology 453
- Cell Biology 257
- Physiology 65
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 218
Countries citing papers authored by Ellen Bible
This map shows the geographic impact of Ellen Bible's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ellen Bible with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ellen Bible more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ellen Bible
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ellen Bible. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ellen Bible. The network helps show where Ellen Bible may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ellen Bible, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2004 | 161 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 149 | |
| 3 | 2006 | 144 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 140 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 115 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 108 | |
| 7 | 2004 | 88 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 63 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 35 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 18 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 9 | |
| 12 | 2002 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 7 | |
| 14 | 2014 | 7 | |
| 15 | 2014 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2012 | 4 | |
| 17 | 2013 | 4 | |
| 18 | 2013 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2014 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2012 | 2 |
About Ellen Bible
Ellen Bible is a scholar working on Physiology, Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Neurology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research (6 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (3 papers), Cellular transport and secretion (3 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (3 papers), Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (3 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (2 papers), Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications (2 papers) and RNA regulation and disease (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (133 citations), Physiology (453 citations), Cell Biology (257 citations), Physiology (65 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (218 citations). Ellen Bible has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan D. Cooper, Michel Modo, David Chau, Kevin M. Shakesheff, Morgan R. Alexander, Praveena Gupta, Megan A. Griffey, Mark S. Sands, Sandra L. Hofmann and Jack Price. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Reviews Neurology, Nature Reviews Nephrology, Biomaterials, Neurobiology of Disease and Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.