Eileen Britt

1.4k citations
36 papers · 1.0k · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Eileen Britt

36 papers receiving 944 citations

Peers

Eileen Britt
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • Applied Psychology 83
  • Clinical Psychology 275
  • Family Practice 20
  • Rehabilitation 59
  • Health 58
Replace Daryl Sharp Minicucci with:
Daryl Sharp Minicucci United States
Mark J. Yaffe⃰ Canada
Rosemary Breger United States
Sandra K. Davidson Australia
Paula Christine Fletcher Canada
Hesook Suzie Kim Norway
Andrew T Olagunju Nigeria
Stephen C. Shannon United Kingdom
Deborah R. Sepinwall United States
Laurence Mynors‐Wallis United Kingdom
Eileen Britt relative to Daryl Sharp Minicucci United States Daryl Sharp Minicucci's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Daryl Sharp Minicucci · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eileen Britt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eileen Britt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eileen Britt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eileen Britt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eileen Britt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eileen Britt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eileen Britt. The network helps show where Eileen Britt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Eileen Britt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eileen Britt Line = papers co-authored together Eileen Britt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003448
2 200392
3 201469
4 201648
5 201842
6 201741
7 201434
8 201722
9 201620
10 201820
11 201920
12 201119
13 200917
14
Cosmetic breast augmentation and eating disorders.
199417
15 201116
16 201814
17 201812
18 201511
19 20168
20 20228

About Eileen Britt

Eileen Britt is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Applied Psychology, Social Psychology, Rehabilitation and General Psychology, having authored 36 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (4 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (4 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (4 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (4 papers), Counseling Practices and Supervision (4 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (3 papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (3 papers) and Migration, Health and Trauma (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (83 citations), Clinical Psychology (275 citations), Family Practice (20 citations), Rehabilitation (59 citations) and Health (58 citations). Eileen Britt has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Neville Morris Blampied, Stephen M. Hudson, Mark Wallace‐Bell, Robert William Teasell, Janet D. Carter, Martin J. Dorahy, Tracey McLellan, Randolph C. Grace, Martin Richard MacFarlane and Audrey McKinlay. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Employment Counseling, The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, Neuropsychology, Measurement Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives and Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact