Edwin Gerow

956 citations
42 papers · 471 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Edwin Gerow

27 papers receiving 331 citations

Peers

Edwin Gerow
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Religious studies 72
  • Language and Linguistics 96
  • Linguistics and Language 35
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 84
  • Philosophy 71
Replace Deniz Zeyrek with:
Deniz Zeyrek Türkiye
Claude Brémond France
Pierre Swiggers Belgium
Lubomír Doležel Canada
R. E. Asher United Kingdom
J. M. Bocheński Poland
Mark Hansell United States
Georges Mounin France
Howard Jackson United Kingdom
Robert E. Longacre United States
Edwin Gerow relative to Deniz Zeyrek Türkiye Deniz Zeyrek's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Deniz Zeyrek · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Edwin Gerow

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edwin Gerow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edwin Gerow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edwin Gerow more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edwin Gerow

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edwin Gerow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edwin Gerow. The network helps show where Edwin Gerow may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Edwin Gerow, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Edwin Gerow Line = papers co-authored together Edwin Gerow links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997304
2 197143
3 197640
4 199416
5 199315
6 19756
7
Śāstrārambha : inquiries into the preamble in Sanskrit
20084
8 19854
9
Why the Fish Laughed, and Other Matters Relating to (the Indian Sense of) "Humor"
20013
10 19923
11 20003
12
The jewel-necklace of argument : (the Vādaratnāvalī of Viṣṇudāsācārya)
19902
13 19952
14 19872
15 19842
16 19892
17 19992
18 20022
19 19792
20
The plays of Kālidāsa : theater of memory
19991

About Edwin Gerow

Edwin Gerow is a scholar working on Religious studies, Philosophy, Language and Linguistics, Anthropology and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 42 papers that have together received 471 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Indian and Buddhist Studies (14 papers), Indian History and Philosophy (11 papers), Eurasian Exchange Networks (5 papers), Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (4 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (4 papers), Ancient Near East History (3 papers), Humor Studies and Applications (2 papers) and South Asian Studies and Diaspora (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (72 citations), Language and Linguistics (96 citations), Linguistics and Language (35 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (84 citations) and Philosophy (71 citations). Edwin Gerow has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Peter T. Daniels, William Bright, A. K. Ramanujan, J. A. B. van Buitenen, W. Crooke, Shahid Amin, Johannes Bronkhorst, E. Annamalai, McKim Marriott and Charles Bell. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Oriental Society, Philosophy East and West, Studia Orientalia Electronica, Medical Entomology and Zoology and Books Abroad.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact