Edward Chay
Impact in
-
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
- Surgery top 10%
- Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
- Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
- Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
- Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
- Intraoperative Neuromonitoring and Anesthetic Effects
Papers in
-
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology 5
- Surgery 4
- Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment 4
- Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques 3
- Co-authors
- Virginie Lafage (4 shared papers)Benjamin Blondel (3 shared papers)Frank Schwab (3 shared papers)Justin S. Smith (3 shared papers)Jean-Pierre Farcy (3 shared papers)Steven D. Glassman (3 shared papers)Christopher P. Ames (3 shared papers)Lawrence G. Lenke (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Neurosurgery (3 papers)Eye & Contact Lens Science & Clinical Practice (1 paper)Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery (1 paper)Spine (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesFrance
In The Last Decade
Edward Chay
6 papers receiving 482 citations
Edward Chay's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 359
- Surgery 472
- Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 7
- Pharmacology 20
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 7
Countries citing papers authored by Edward Chay
This map shows the geographic impact of Edward Chay's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edward Chay with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edward Chay more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Edward Chay
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edward Chay. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edward Chay. The network helps show where Edward Chay may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 20 scholars most cited alongside Edward Chay, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Comprehensive Anatomical Spinal Osteotomy Classification Hit paper breakdown → | 2013 | 345 |
| 2 | 2015 | 91 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 19 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 19 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 17 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 2 |
About Edward Chay
Edward Chay is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Surgery, Ophthalmology, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 6 papers that have together received 493 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (5 papers), Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment (4 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (3 papers), Older Adults Driving Studies (1 paper), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (1 paper), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (1 paper), Injury Epidemiology and Prevention (1 paper) and Medical Imaging and Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (359 citations), Surgery (472 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (7 citations), Pharmacology (20 citations) and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (7 citations). Edward Chay has collaborated with scholars based in United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Virginie Lafage, Benjamin Blondel, Frank Schwab, Justin S. Smith, Jean-Pierre Farcy, Steven D. Glassman, Christopher P. Ames, Lawrence G. Lenke, Christopher I. Shaffrey and Jason Demakakos. Their work appears in journals such as Neurosurgery, Eye & Contact Lens Science & Clinical Practice, Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery and Spine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.