Edgar N. Mayer

2.0k citations
5 papers · 847 · 1 hit paper · h-index 3

Impact in

Papers in

Edgar N. Mayer

5 papers receiving 661 citations

Edgar N. Mayer's Hit Papers

French Syntax: The Transformational Cycle 1976 · 516 citations
5160+16+33Years since publication100200300400500

Peers

Edgar N. Mayer
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Language and Linguistics 580
  • Linguistics and Language 168
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 218
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 173
  • Philosophy 151
Replace Peter S. Rosenbaum with:
Peter S. Rosenbaum United States
Roderick A. Jacobs United States
Marion Owen United Kingdom
James W. Ney United States
C. L. Baker United States
Gregory N. Carlson United States
Manfred Bierwisch Germany
Danny D. Steinberg United States
Pamela A. Downing United States
Dieter Wunderlich Germany
Edgar N. Mayer relative to Peter S. Rosenbaum United States Peter S. Rosenbaum's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Peter S. Rosenbaum · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Edgar N. Mayer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edgar N. Mayer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edgar N. Mayer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edgar N. Mayer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edgar N. Mayer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edgar N. Mayer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edgar N. Mayer. The network helps show where Edgar N. Mayer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Edgar N. Mayer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Edgar N. Mayer Line = papers co-authored together Edgar N. Mayer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

5 of 5 papers shown
#Work
1
French Syntax: The Transformational Cycle
Hit paper breakdown →
1976516
2 1981302
3 197827
4
Stems in the French Verb.
19691
5
The solar laboratory of the University Simon Bolivar.
19821

About Edgar N. Mayer

Edgar N. Mayer is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Philosophy, Literature and Literary Theory, Artificial Intelligence and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 5 papers that have together received 847 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (2 papers), Linguistics and Discourse Analysis (2 papers), Second Language Learning and Teaching (1 paper), Text Readability and Simplification (1 paper), Second Language Acquisition and Learning (1 paper) and Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Language and Linguistics (580 citations), Linguistics and Language (168 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (218 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (173 citations) and Philosophy (151 citations). Frequent co-authors include Richard S. Kayne, Noam Chomsky, S. Pit Corder, Eddy Roulet and J. Iriarte. Their work appears in journals such as Modern Language Journal and ˜The œFrench review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact