Eda Karaismailoğlu

28 papers receiving 378 citations

Peers

Eda Karaismailoğlu
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 15
  • Oral Surgery 48
  • General Dentistry 9
  • Dermatology 44
  • Gastroenterology 25
Replace Giulio Conti with:
Giulio Conti Italy
K C Ndukwe Nigeria
Irit Yaniv United States
Bing Guo Canada
Michelle Trevenen Australia
Maryam Rad Iran
Tadakazu Sakuragi Japan
S. Paraskevas Netherlands
Alexandra Soós Hungary
C. L. Bandt United States
Eda Karaismailoğlu relative to Giulio Conti Italy Giulio Conti's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×12.5×
Giulio Conti · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eda Karaismailoğlu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eda Karaismailoğlu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eda Karaismailoğlu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eda Karaismailoğlu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eda Karaismailoğlu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eda Karaismailoğlu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eda Karaismailoğlu. The network helps show where Eda Karaismailoğlu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Eda Karaismailoğlu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eda Karaismailoğlu Line = papers co-authored together Eda Karaismailoğlu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201640
2 201739
3 201427
4 201527
5 202025
6 202125
7 201823
8 201923
9 201522
10 201821
11 201618
12 202112
13 202111
14 201711
15 20229
16 20188
17 20138
18 20196
19 20244
20 20224

About Eda Karaismailoğlu

Eda Karaismailoğlu is a scholar working on Surgery, Cognitive Neuroscience, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Oral Surgery and Infectious Diseases, having authored 33 papers that have together received 387 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments (3 papers), Machine Learning in Healthcare (2 papers), Thyroid Disorders and Treatments (2 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (2 papers), Dental materials and restorations (2 papers), COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (2 papers), Vitamin C and Antioxidants Research (1 paper) and Vitamin K Research Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (15 citations), Oral Surgery (48 citations), General Dentistry (9 citations), Dermatology (44 citations) and Gastroenterology (25 citations). Eda Karaismailoğlu has collaborated with scholars based in Türkiye, United States and Cambodia. Frequent co-authors include Hacer Aksel, Özlem Şahin, Alireza Ziaei, Gülşen Akoğlu, A Aksan, Winfried Häuser, Z. Günnur Dikmen, Selen Küçükkaya Eren, Petek Korkusuz and Filiz Akbıyık. Their work appears in journals such as Dermatologic Therapy, Journal of Endodontics, Journal of Medical Virology, Heliyon and Allergy and Asthma Proceedings.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact