É. Viel

49 papers receiving 420 citations

Peers

É. Viel
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 63
  • Neurology 49
  • Oncology 86
  • Surgery 125
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 56
Replace Laurence E. Ring with:
Laurence E. Ring United States
Jason M. Hoover United States
Shaowei Gao China
José M. Mier Spain
James Szocik United States
Hsuan‐Hwai Lin Taiwan
Hiroyuki Yamasaki Japan
J. J. Wang Taiwan
D. Harney Ireland
Jun Fang China
É. Viel relative to Laurence E. Ring United States Laurence E. Ring's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Laurence E. Ring · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by É. Viel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of É. Viel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by É. Viel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites É. Viel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by É. Viel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by É. Viel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by É. Viel. The network helps show where É. Viel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside É. Viel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with É. Viel Line = papers co-authored together É. Viel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 56 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201178
2 201142
3 200629
4 201628
5 200521
6 201318
7 201216
8 199916
9
[Chemical neurolysis using alcohol (alcoholization) in the treatment of spasticity in the hemiplegic].
199315
10 198914
11 200813
12 201412
13
Management of reflex sympathetic dystrophy.
199912
14
[Alcohol neurolytic blocks for pain and muscle spasticity].
200312
15
La marche humaine - kinesiologie, dynamique, biomécanique et pathomécanique.
198910
16 198310
17 201110
18 20189
19 19907
20 20047

About É. Viel

É. Viel is a scholar working on Surgery, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Oncology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 56 papers that have together received 455 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anesthesia and Pain Management (18 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (8 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (7 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (5 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (5 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (4 papers), Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (4 papers) and Pain Management and Treatment (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (63 citations), Neurology (49 citations), Oncology (86 citations), Surgery (125 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (56 citations). É. Viel has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Jacques Ripart, Jean‐Jacques Eledjam, Christophe Borg, Christophe Ferrand, J.J. Eledjam, J. Pélissier, F. Pellas, Jean‐René Pallandre, B. Simon and Michael Klagsbrun. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Cancer, Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, Clinical Cancer Research, International Journal of Palliative Nursing and Lasers in Surgery and Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact