E. Stilp

695 citations
15 papers · 612 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

E. Stilp

15 papers receiving 604 citations

Peers

E. Stilp
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
  • Automotive Engineering 155
  • Condensed Matter Physics 95
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 458
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 96
  • Materials Chemistry 226
Replace M. Zerrouki with:
M. Zerrouki France
Jakob Blomqvist Sweden
Baltej Singh India
Michael Küpers Germany
Hyung-Man Cho United States
B.S. Medvedev Russia
Kenji Nakane Japan
V.S. Gorshkov Russia
Apostolos Kordatos United Kingdom
B. Fultz United States
E. Stilp relative to M. Zerrouki France M. Zerrouki's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.6×
M. Zerrouki · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. Stilp

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Stilp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Stilp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Stilp more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Stilp

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Stilp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Stilp. The network helps show where E. Stilp may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. Stilp, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. Stilp Line = papers co-authored together E. Stilp links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2019176
2 2017136
3 2018100
4 201952
5 201325
6 201823
7 201822
8
Evidence for coexistence of bulk superconductivity and itinerant antiferromagnetism in the heavy fermion system CeCo(In<sub>1-<em>x</em></sub>Cd<em><sub>x</sub></em>)<sub>5</sub>
201517
9 201315
10 201313
11 201412
12 20149
13 20117
14 20184
15 20211

About E. Stilp

E. Stilp is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Automotive Engineering and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 15 papers that have together received 612 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (7 papers), Advancements in Battery Materials (6 papers), Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies (5 papers), Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (5 papers), Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (4 papers), Advanced Battery Technologies Research (3 papers), Magnetic properties of thin films (2 papers) and Iron-based superconductors research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Automotive Engineering (155 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (95 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (458 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (96 citations) and Materials Chemistry (226 citations). E. Stilp has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Reto Pfenninger, Jennifer L. M. Rupp, Michał Struzik, Íñigo Garbayo, Corsin Battaglia, Arndt Remhof, Eduardo Cuervo Reyes, Léo Duchêne, Ruben‐Simon Kühnel and Hans Hagemann. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. B., ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, Scientific Reports, Physical Review B and Nature Energy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact