E. Schimpf

17 papers receiving 399 citations

Peers

E. Schimpf
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 210
  • Inorganic Chemistry 208
  • Radiation 79
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 63
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 117
Replace U. W. Scherer with:
U. W. Scherer Germany
Β. Schausten Germany
S. N. Timokhin Russia
J. D. Leyba United States
Β. Kadkhodayan United States
M. R. Lane United States
D. Trubert France
Ν. J. Hannink United States
P. Thörle Germany
J. P. Omtvedt Norway
E. Schimpf relative to U. W. Scherer Germany U. W. Scherer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
U. W. Scherer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. Schimpf

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Schimpf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Schimpf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Schimpf more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Schimpf

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Schimpf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Schimpf. The network helps show where E. Schimpf may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. Schimpf, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. Schimpf Line = papers co-authored together E. Schimpf links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 198975
2 200856
3 199247
4 199345
5 199245
6 199237
7 199233
8 200423
9 199412
10 201111
11 200911
12 200811
13 199910
14 20087
15 19946
16 19981
17
Separation of W from Ta, Hf, Lu and Mo by BPHAC_5H_(11)OH/HCl extraction system (Model experiments for chemical study of seaborgium, the 106th element)
20011
18
Cross section limits for the Cm-248(Mg-25,4n-5n) Hs-(268,269) reactions
20090

About E. Schimpf

E. Schimpf is a scholar working on Radiation, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Condensed Matter Physics, Inorganic Chemistry and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, having authored 18 papers that have together received 431 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nuclear physics research studies (6 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (6 papers), Astronomical and nuclear sciences (4 papers), Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (3 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (3 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Characterization (2 papers), Analytical chemistry methods development (2 papers) and Rare-earth and actinide compounds (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (210 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (208 citations), Radiation (79 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (63 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (117 citations). E. Schimpf has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include M. Schädel, W. Brüchle, H. P. Zimmermann, Jens Volker Kratz, U. W. Scherer, Α. Türler, M. Nurmia, Κ. Ε. Gregorich, Β. Kadkhodayan and Elke Jäger. Their work appears in journals such as Physica C Superconductivity, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, The European Physical Journal A, Water Science & Technology and Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact