E. Prokop

14 papers receiving 452 citations

Peers

E. Prokop
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Cancer Research 199
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 56
  • Genetics 150
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 34
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 85
Replace Zlatko Pozeg with:
Zlatko Pozeg Canada
Matthew Chapman Australia
Francisco J. Díaz Spain
Márcia Puñales Brazil
T. Musella Italy
Paul Mitchell United Kingdom
Susan K. Morton Australia
Richard D. Spangler United States
T Horne Israel
Shih Cheng United States
E. Prokop relative to Zlatko Pozeg Canada Zlatko Pozeg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15.3×
Zlatko Pozeg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. Prokop

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Prokop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Prokop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Prokop more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Prokop

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Prokop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Prokop. The network helps show where E. Prokop may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. Prokop, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. Prokop Line = papers co-authored together E. Prokop links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 1967142
2 200361
3 200051
4 200347
5 200444
6 196841
7 201326
8 200323
9 200522
10 200311
11
Discordant inter-kit results in the radioimmunoassay for choriogonadotropin in serum.
19847
12 20032
13
[Effects of confrontation of medical students and hospital physicians with human cadavers].
19932
14 19861
15 20030

About E. Prokop

E. Prokop is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology and Genetics, having authored 15 papers that have together received 480 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (6 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (3 papers), High Altitude and Hypoxia (2 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (1 paper), Medical and Biological Sciences (1 paper), Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (1 paper), Bone Metabolism and Diseases (1 paper) and Radiology practices and education (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (199 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (56 citations), Genetics (150 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (34 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (85 citations). E. Prokop has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Florentia Peintinger, Roland Reitsamer, Lukas Rettenbacher, James Kollias, E. R. Buskirk, Christian Menzel, Thomas Rettenbacher, Christian Weismann, Rosemarie Forstner and Paul T. Baker. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Physiology, World Journal of Surgery, Anesthesiology, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer and Anti-Cancer Drugs.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact