E Prijot

563 citations
45 papers · 409 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

E Prijot

37 papers receiving 208 citations

Peers

E Prijot
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Ophthalmology 262
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 86
  • Neurology 59
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 69
  • Neurology 21
Replace Wolfgang Leydhecker with:
Wolfgang Leydhecker Germany
Frank D. Costenbader United States
James L. Kennerley Bankes United Kingdom
Samuel V Abraham United Kingdom
U. Guthauser Switzerland
W. M. Jay United States
Donna N. Loupe United States
J A Sharkey United Kingdom
John H. Mensher United States
M. Kaup Germany
E Prijot relative to Wolfgang Leydhecker Germany Wolfgang Leydhecker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Wolfgang Leydhecker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E Prijot

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E Prijot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E Prijot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E Prijot more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E Prijot

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E Prijot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E Prijot. The network helps show where E Prijot may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside E Prijot, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E Prijot Line = papers co-authored together E Prijot links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 195538
2 195538
3 195631
4 195230
5 195425
6 195422
7 195219
8 195917
9 195817
10 195216
11 195215
12 195215
13 195714
14 196013
15 195210
16 19578
17 19647
18 19607
19 19516
20
[Correction of tonometric measurements in patients with high or low ocular rigidity].
19586

About E Prijot

E Prijot is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Neurology and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 45 papers that have together received 409 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (15 papers), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (7 papers), Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring (5 papers), Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (5 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (5 papers), Infrared Thermography in Medicine (5 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (4 papers) and Corneal surgery and disorders (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (262 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (86 citations), Neurology (59 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (69 citations) and Neurology (21 citations). E Prijot has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium. Frequent co-authors include R Weekers, Erik Linnér, Jillian Gustin, G. Lavergne, Michael K. Gilson, Marta M. Gilson and Giulia Ercoli. Their work appears in journals such as Ophthalmologica, Acta Ophthalmologica, British Journal of Ophthalmology, American Journal of Ophthalmology and Documenta Ophthalmologica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact