E. Novais

602 citations
27 papers · 427 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

E. Novais

27 papers receiving 422 citations

Peers

E. Novais
Comparison fields: 5 of 25
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 348
  • Condensed Matter Physics 123
  • Artificial Intelligence 186
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 61
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 27
Replace G. Granger with:
G. Granger Canada
J. M. Hornibrook Australia
Sebastian Pauka Australia
Valeriu Moldoveanu Romania
Sami Amasha United States
S. Amaha Japan
Babak Zare Rameshti Iran
J. J. Viennot France
Alto Osada Japan
Stefano Bosco Switzerland
E. Novais relative to G. Granger Canada G. Granger's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
G. Granger · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. Novais

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Novais's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Novais with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Novais more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Novais

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Novais. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Novais. The network helps show where E. Novais may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. Novais, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. Novais Line = papers co-authored together E. Novais links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201489
2 200340
3 200536
4 201325
5 200623
6 200722
7 201020
8 201118
9 200816
10 200216
11 200215
12 201415
13 201413
14 201712
15 201311
16 20027
17 20047
18 20107
19 20137
20 20126

About E. Novais

E. Novais is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Condensed Matter Physics, Artificial Intelligence, Biomedical Engineering and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 27 papers that have together received 427 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum and electron transport phenomena (12 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (10 papers), Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture (9 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (9 papers), Magnetic properties of thin films (8 papers), Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles (5 papers), Quantum many-body systems (4 papers) and Rare-earth and actinide compounds (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (348 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (123 citations), Artificial Intelligence (186 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (61 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (27 citations). E. Novais has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Eduardo R. Mucciolo, Harold U. Baranger, A. H. Castro Neto, Dragi Karevski, Gabriel T. Landi, Mário J. de Oliveira, Gergely Zaránd, L. Borda, Ian Affleck and F. García. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Journal of Applied Physics, Physical Review A, Physical review. B, Condensed matter and Physical review. A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact