E M James

51 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

E M James
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 334
  • Nephrology 134
  • Internal Medicine 63
  • Hepatology 125
  • Epidemiology 396
Replace T H Shawker with:
T H Shawker United States
David L. Gang United States
Laurent Bresler France
Laura Connelly‐Smith United States
Kyung J. Cho United States
W Scheible United States
William A. Hawk United States
Allen R. Myers United States
Huei‐Lung Liang Taiwan
Sedat Yıldırım Türkiye
E M James relative to T H Shawker United States T H Shawker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
T H Shawker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E M James

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E M James's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E M James with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E M James more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E M James

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E M James. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E M James. The network helps show where E M James may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E M James, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E M James Line = papers co-authored together E M James links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996194
2 1987164
3 1988141
4 1988106
5 198284
6 198782
7 198673
8 200065
9 199463
10 197061
11 197448
12 198248
13 198338
14 199433
15 198933
16 198631
17
Positive predictive value of clinical suspicion of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Implications for efficient use of abdominal ultrasonography.
199027
18 198926
19 199121
20 198720

About E M James

E M James is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Epidemiology, Oncology and Nephrology, having authored 51 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments (6 papers), Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases (6 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (5 papers), Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances (5 papers), Advanced Data Compression Techniques (5 papers), Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention (4 papers), Sarcoidosis and Beryllium Toxicity Research (4 papers) and Medical Imaging and Pathology Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (334 citations), Nephrology (134 citations), Internal Medicine (63 citations), Hepatology (125 citations) and Epidemiology (396 citations). E M James has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Vietnam and Canada. Frequent co-authors include J. William Charboneau, Carl C. Reading, W. Jones Williams, Clive S. Grant, C S Grant, Bradley Lewis, Ian Hay, Colum A. Gorman, Kenneth P. Offord and Hossein Gharib. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Digital Imaging, Radiology, Mayo Clinic Proceedings, Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine and Thorax.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact