E. Leite

619 citations
23 papers · 508 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

E. Leite

21 papers receiving 475 citations

Peers

E. Leite
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Ophthalmology 376
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 271
  • Epidemiology 161
  • Clinical Biochemistry 30
  • Neurology 19
Replace Hyung Woo Kwak with:
Hyung Woo Kwak South Korea
Mark L. McDermott United States
António Campos Portugal
Teresia A. Carreon United States
J H Kok Netherlands
Taiji Takanashi Japan
Vikram Brar United States
Mark S. Dikopf United States
H. Gnad Austria
Paula Scholz Germany
E. Leite relative to Hyung Woo Kwak South Korea Hyung Woo Kwak's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Hyung Woo Kwak · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. Leite

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Leite's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Leite with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Leite more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Leite

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Leite. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Leite. The network helps show where E. Leite may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. Leite, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. Leite Line = papers co-authored together E. Leite links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200172
2 199664
3 198560
4 199658
5 199049
6 199147
7 199832
8 199524
9 199816
10 199814
11 200711
12 199611
13 199010
14 19959
15 19978
16 19936
17 19956
18 19904
19 20053
20
[Quantification of the foveolar zone in normal and diabetic patients].
19892

About E. Leite

E. Leite is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Epidemiology, Surgery and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 23 papers that have together received 508 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (9 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (8 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (6 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (6 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (6 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (3 papers), Ocular Infections and Treatments (3 papers) and Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effects (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (376 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (271 citations), Epidemiology (161 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (30 citations) and Neurology (19 citations). E. Leite has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include José Cunha‐Vaz, J. R. Faria de Abreu, Ulf Stenevi, Mats Lundström, Peter J. Barry, José S. Ramalho, John R. Gray, J. Wollensak, Alf Nyström and Kjell U. Sandvig. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, Journal of Refractive Surgery, British Journal of Ophthalmology and Journal of Materials Science Materials in Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact