E. D. Bloom
Impact in
-
- Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
- Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
- High-Energy Particle Collisions Research
- Neutrino Physics Research
- Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Nuclear physics research studies
- Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
Papers in
-
- Advanced Chemical Physics Studies 1
-
- Nuclear Physics and Applications 1
- Co-authors
- Frederick J. Gilman (1 shared paper)J. Friedman (1 shared paper)J. Drees (1 shared paper)Henry W. Kendall (1 shared paper)M. Breidenbach (1 shared paper)H. DeStaebler (1 shared paper)Liping Mo (1 shared paper)R. E. Taylor (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Physical Review Letters (1 paper)Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
E. D. Bloom
2 papers receiving 470 citations
E. D. Bloom's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 452
- Computational Mathematics 2
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 60
- Theoretical Computer Science 2
- Radiation 15
Countries citing papers authored by E. D. Bloom
This map shows the geographic impact of E. D. Bloom's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. D. Bloom with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. D. Bloom more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by E. D. Bloom
This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. D. Bloom. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. D. Bloom. The network helps show where E. D. Bloom may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 9 scholars most cited alongside E. D. Bloom, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Observed Behavior of Highly Inelastic Electron-Proton Scattering Hit paper breakdown → | 1969 | 320 |
| 2 | 1971 | 190 |
About E. D. Bloom
E. D. Bloom is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Radiation, Surfaces, Coatings and Films, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Nuclear and High Energy Physics, having authored 2 papers that have together received 510 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (1 paper), Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques (1 paper), Nuclear physics research studies (1 paper), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (1 paper), Nuclear Physics and Applications (1 paper) and Particle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (452 citations), Computational Mathematics (2 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (60 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (2 citations) and Radiation (15 citations). E. D. Bloom has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Frederick J. Gilman, J. Friedman, J. Drees, Henry W. Kendall, M. Breidenbach, H. DeStaebler, Liping Mo, R. E. Taylor and D. H. Coward. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters and Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.