E. A. Chase
Impact in
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 5%
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
- Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
-
- Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
Papers in
-
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research 9
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae 8
- Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations 4
-
- Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena 2
- Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics 1
- Co-authors
- Ryan Wollaeger (5 shared papers)Christopher J. Fontes (5 shared papers)Oleg Korobkin (5 shared papers)Chris L. Fryer (5 shared papers)Aimee Hungerford (3 shared papers)C. Pankow (3 shared papers)E. Troja (3 shared papers)Matthew R. Mumpower (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Physical Review Research (2 papers)The Astrophysical Journal (2 papers)Physical Review Letters (2 papers)The Astrophysical Journal Letters (2 papers)Physical review. D (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
E. A. Chase
9 papers receiving 263 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 19
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 277
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 74
- Geophysics 37
- Oceanography 28
- Instrumentation 8
Countries citing papers authored by E. A. Chase
This map shows the geographic impact of E. A. Chase's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. A. Chase with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. A. Chase more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by E. A. Chase
This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. A. Chase. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. A. Chase. The network helps show where E. A. Chase may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. A. Chase, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 77 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 69 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 41 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 32 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 17 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 17 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 12 | |
| 8 | 2023 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2024 | 7 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 0 |
About E. A. Chase
E. A. Chase is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Geophysics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 10 papers that have together received 283 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (9 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (8 papers), Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (4 papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (2 papers), Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (2 papers), Seismic Waves and Analysis (1 paper), Advanced Frequency and Time Standards (1 paper) and Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (277 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (74 citations), Geophysics (37 citations), Oceanography (28 citations) and Instrumentation (8 citations). E. A. Chase has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Ryan Wollaeger, Christopher J. Fontes, Oleg Korobkin, Chris L. Fryer, Aimee Hungerford, C. Pankow, E. Troja, Matthew R. Mumpower, Jonas Lippuner and Neil J. Cornish. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Research, The Astrophysical Journal, Physical Review Letters, The Astrophysical Journal Letters and Physical review. D.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.