Drew Conway

425 citations
7 papers · 277 · h-index 4

Impact in

Papers in

Drew Conway

5 papers receiving 255 citations

Peers

Drew Conway
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • General Social Sciences 73
  • Communication 53
  • Computer Science Applications 29
  • Artificial Intelligence 103
  • Political Science and International Relations 66
Replace Christopher Kotfila with:
Christopher Kotfila United States
Alexandra Schofield United States
Eirik Stavelin Norway
Weicong Ding United States
Francisco Javier García Marco Spain
Terrell Russell United States
Felix Hamborg Germany
Giulia Bonelli Italy
Tae Yano United States
Nabeil Maflahi United Kingdom
Drew Conway relative to Christopher Kotfila United States Christopher Kotfila's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Christopher Kotfila · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Drew Conway

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Drew Conway's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Drew Conway with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Drew Conway more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Drew Conway

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Drew Conway. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Drew Conway. The network helps show where Drew Conway may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Drew Conway, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Drew Conway Line = papers co-authored together Drew Conway links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
#Work
1 2016203
2
Machine Learning for Hackers
201262
3
Machine Learning for Email: Spam Filtering and Priority Inbox
20115
4 20144
5 19712
6 20131
7 20100

About Drew Conway

Drew Conway is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Communication, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Ecology and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 7 papers that have together received 277 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (1 paper), Soil erosion and sediment transport (1 paper), Fire effects on ecosystems (1 paper), Computational and Text Analysis Methods (1 paper), Game Theory and Applications (1 paper), Media Influence and Politics (1 paper), Social Media and Politics (1 paper) and Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Social Sciences (73 citations), Communication (53 citations), Computer Science Applications (29 citations), Artificial Intelligence (103 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (66 citations). Drew Conway has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Kenneth Benoit, Michael Laver, Benjamin Lauderdale, Slava Mikhaylov and J.M. White. Their work appears in journals such as Remote Sensing of Environment, American Political Science Review, CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) and SSRN Electronic Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact