Dows Dunham

511 citations
13 papers · 93 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Dows Dunham

12 papers receiving 60 citations

Peers

Dows Dunham
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Space and Planetary Science 7
  • Archeology 34
  • Archeology 3
  • Applied Psychology 7
  • Clinical Psychology 20
Replace George Elliott Howard with:
George Elliott Howard United States
Stanisław Gronkiewicz Poland
Gerald J. Cox United States
W. D. Ross Canada
Wayne E. Stevens United States
Lars Krutak United States
Markus Kohl United States
Swâmi Vivekananda
Philippe Delhaye France
Jodie Leditschke Australia
Dows Dunham relative to George Elliott Howard United States George Elliott Howard's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
George Elliott Howard · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dows Dunham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dows Dunham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dows Dunham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dows Dunham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dows Dunham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dows Dunham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dows Dunham. The network helps show where Dows Dunham may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Dows Dunham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dows Dunham Line = papers co-authored together Dows Dunham links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 197727
2
The Royal cemeteries of Kush
195513
3 198912
4 19938
5
Royal tombs at Meroë and Barkal
19577
6
The mastabas of Qar and Idu, G7101 and 7102
19767
7 19645
8 19815
9
Building an Egyptian pyramid
19563
10 19723
11 19702
12 19681
13 19640

About Dows Dunham

Dows Dunham is a scholar working on Archeology, Political Science and International Relations, Anthropology, Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics of Materials, having authored 13 papers that have together received 93 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ancient Egypt and Archaeology (9 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (8 papers), High Temperature Alloys and Creep (2 papers), Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (2 papers), Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography (2 papers), Global Maritime and Colonial Histories (1 paper), Architecture and Cultural Influences (1 paper) and Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Space and Planetary Science (7 citations), Archeology (34 citations), Archeology (3 citations), Applied Psychology (7 citations) and Clinical Psychology (20 citations). Dows Dunham has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include William Kelly Simpson, J.C. Gibeling, T. G. H. James, Geoffrey T. Martin, George Andrew Reisner, Alan R. Schulman and A. J. Arkell. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, Journal of the American Oriental Society, Medical Entomology and Zoology, Man and Acta Metallurgica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact