Doug Williams

26 papers receiving 306 citations

Peers

Doug Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 105
  • Human-Computer Interaction 27
  • Sociology and Political Science 121
  • Spectroscopy 36
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 118
Replace Margit Kristensen with:
Margit Kristensen Denmark
James C. Miller United States
Iflaah Salman Finland
Robert Short United States
Chun-Han Lin Taiwan
Supun Nakandala United States
Zhijing Wu China
Tingyao Wu China
Thomas Plank Austria
Stanisław Woźniak Poland
Doug Williams relative to Margit Kristensen Denmark Margit Kristensen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Margit Kristensen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Doug Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Doug Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Doug Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Doug Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Doug Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Doug Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Doug Williams. The network helps show where Doug Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Doug Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Doug Williams Line = papers co-authored together Doug Williams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200857
2 199456
3 199243
4 200835
5 200930
6 200916
7 200116
8 199616
9 201315
10 20109
11 20074
12 20174
13 20073
14 19973
15 20123
16 20153
17 20163
18
Enhancing Social Communication and Belonging by Integrating TV Narrativity and Game-Play
20092
19
Distributed Theatre: Connecting (with) Remote Audiences
20152
20 20192

About Doug Williams

Doug Williams is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Computer Networks and Communications, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 28 papers that have together received 328 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multimedia Communication and Technology (17 papers), Video Analysis and Summarization (9 papers), Digital Games and Media (8 papers), Peer-to-Peer Network Technologies (4 papers), Optical Network Technologies (3 papers), Thermal Radiation and Cooling Technologies (2 papers), Advanced Fiber Optic Sensors (2 papers) and Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (105 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (27 citations), Sociology and Political Science (121 citations), Spectroscopy (36 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (118 citations). Doug Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Marian F. Ursu, Ian Kegel, Raman Kashyap, J.F. Massicott, Pablo César, J.R. Armitage, John Wyver, Nina Lansbury, Marc Steen and Jan Buijs. Their work appears in journals such as Electronics Letters, IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing, IEEE Multimedia, Multimedia Systems and ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing Communications and Applications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact