Doğan Çörüş

687 citations
24 papers · 505 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Doğan Çörüş

24 papers receiving 499 citations

Peers

Doğan Çörüş
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
  • Artificial Intelligence 380
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 46
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 18
  • Biomedical Engineering 50
  • Software 5
Replace Justin K. Pugh with:
Justin K. Pugh United States
JAN J. MULAWKA Poland
Frank Vavak United Kingdom
Sheng-Wei Tsai Taiwan
Peilan Xu China
Christine Zarges United Kingdom
Pablo A. D. Castro Brazil
Jayshree Sarma United States
Wu Zhu China
William Mydlowec United States
Doğan Çörüş relative to Justin K. Pugh United States Justin K. Pugh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.8×
Justin K. Pugh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Doğan Çörüş

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Doğan Çörüş's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Doğan Çörüş with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Doğan Çörüş more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Doğan Çörüş

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Doğan Çörüş. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Doğan Çörüş. The network helps show where Doğan Çörüş may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Doğan Çörüş, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Doğan Çörüş Line = papers co-authored together Doğan Çörüş links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017108
2 2017105
3 201933
4 201931
5 201526
6 201924
7 201723
8 201821
9 201620
10 201419
11 202117
12 201514
13 202113
14 202111
15 201310
16 20187
17 20186
18 20155
19 20195
20 20172

About Doğan Çörüş

Doğan Çörüş is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Biomedical Engineering, Genetics, Nuclear Energy and Engineering and Waste Management and Disposal, having authored 24 papers that have together received 505 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research (14 papers), Artificial Immune Systems Applications (9 papers), Evolutionary Algorithms and Applications (3 papers) and Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Artificial Intelligence (380 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (46 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (18 citations), Biomedical Engineering (50 citations) and Software (5 citations). Doğan Çörüş has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Türkiye and China. Frequent co-authors include Pietro S. Oliveto, Per Kristian Lehre, Duc-Cuong Dang, Anton V. Eremeev, D. Yazdani, Dirk Sudholt, Frank Neumann, Jun He, Thomas Jansen and Christine Zarges. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, Algorithmica, Evolutionary Computation, Journal of Theoretical Biology and Operations research, computer science. Interface series.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact