DO Hodge

596 citations
6 papers · 514 · 1 hit paper · h-index 3

Impact in

Papers in

DO Hodge

5 papers receiving 489 citations

DO Hodge's Hit Papers

Central corneal endothelial cell changes over a ten-year period. 1997 · 505 citations
5050+9+19Years since publication100200300400500

Peers

DO Hodge
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 385
  • Ophthalmology 142
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 53
  • Epidemiology 16
  • Biomaterials 5
Replace S. Scheer with:
S. Scheer France
Vinicius S. De Stefano United States
Marie Therese Lowe Australia
Elias Pavlatos United States
Michael Küchle Germany
Esther A. Groeneveld–van Beek Netherlands
CP Lohmann Germany
Karin Szerenyi United States
George Cherfan Lebanon
Philip Enders Germany
DO Hodge relative to S. Scheer France S. Scheer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
S. Scheer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by DO Hodge

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of DO Hodge's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by DO Hodge with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites DO Hodge more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by DO Hodge

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by DO Hodge. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by DO Hodge. The network helps show where DO Hodge may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside DO Hodge, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with DO Hodge Line = papers co-authored together DO Hodge links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
#Work
1
Central corneal endothelial cell changes over a ten-year period.
Hit paper breakdown →
1997505
2 20173
3
Conversion rate of Pseudoexfoliation Syndrome to Pseudoexfoliation Glaucoma in a Population-based Study
20023
4
Corneal Thickness Measurement: Disagreement between Confocal Microscopy and Ultrasonic Pachometry
20022
5 19951
6
Incidence and Etiology of Sixth Nerve Palsy: A Population-based Study
20020

About DO Hodge

DO Hodge is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Ophthalmology, Surgery and Neurology, having authored 6 papers that have together received 514 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (2 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (2 papers), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (2 papers), Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (1 paper), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (1 paper), Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques (1 paper), Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (1 paper) and Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (385 citations), Ophthalmology (142 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (53 citations), Epidemiology (16 citations) and Biomaterials (5 citations). DO Hodge has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include W. M. Bourne, Jo Jo Hai, Václav Křemen, C. Anwar A. Chahal, Alan Sugrue, RJ Gibbons and Gen‐Min Lin. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Ophthalmology, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology and HighWire Press Open Archive.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact