Dina Machuve

684 citations
38 papers · 389 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Dina Machuve

30 papers receiving 357 citations

Peers

Dina Machuve
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Computer Science Applications 75
  • Animal Science and Zoology 60
  • Health Information Management 22
  • Analytical Chemistry 44
  • Health Informatics 6
Replace Neema Mduma with:
Neema Mduma Tanzania
Jaime Alonso Spain
Abdul Samad Pakistan
Mauricio Toro Colombia
Wulandari Wulandari Indonesia
Ángel Pinto Colombia
Tatiana Atanasova Bulgaria
Oky Dwi Nurhayati Indonesia
Bruce Roberts United States
Angela Davies United Kingdom
Dina Machuve relative to Neema Mduma Tanzania Neema Mduma's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.9×
Neema Mduma · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dina Machuve

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dina Machuve's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dina Machuve with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dina Machuve more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dina Machuve

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dina Machuve. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dina Machuve. The network helps show where Dina Machuve may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Dina Machuve, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dina Machuve Line = papers co-authored together Dina Machuve links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201967
2 202064
3 202048
4 202244
5 202136
6 201925
7 202122
8 202118
9 202113
10
Overview Applications of Data Mining In Health Care: The Case Study of Arusha Region
201310
11 20197
12 20194
13 20214
14 20243
15 20183
16 20132
17 20202
18 20212
19 20212
20 20202

About Dina Machuve

Dina Machuve is a scholar working on Information Systems, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Networks and Communications, Computer Science Applications and Plant Science, having authored 38 papers that have together received 389 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Smart Agriculture and AI (6 papers), ICT in Developing Communities (5 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (4 papers), Data Stream Mining Techniques (3 papers), Leaf Properties and Growth Measurement (3 papers), Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing (2 papers), IoT and Edge/Fog Computing (2 papers) and Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (75 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (60 citations), Health Information Management (22 citations), Analytical Chemistry (44 citations) and Health Informatics (6 citations). Dina Machuve has collaborated with scholars based in Tanzania, Finland and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Neema Mduma, Khamisi Kalegele, Sawahiko Shimada, Baraka Maiseli, Karen Bradshaw, Thomas Clemen, Anael Sam, Michael Kisangiri, Mussa Ally Dida and Pirkko Nykänen. Their work appears in journals such as Data Science Journal, Applied Artificial Intelligence, Scientific African, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact