Die Fang
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- COVID-19 and Mental Health
- Child Abuse and Trauma
- Resilience and Mental Health
-
- Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Papers in
-
- Suicide and Self-Harm Studies 8
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development 4
- Child Abuse and Trauma 2
- COVID-19 and Mental Health 1
-
- Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression 4
- Co-authors
- Hailiang Ran (26 shared papers)Yuanyuan Xiao (26 shared papers)Yusan Che (25 shared papers)Junwei Peng (16 shared papers)Lin Chen (13 shared papers)Jin Gui Lu (16 shared papers)Hao Sun (11 shared papers)Xiufeng Xu (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- BMC Public Health (7 papers)Journal of Affective Disorders (5 papers)PeerJ (2 papers)Frontiers in Psychiatry (2 papers)Archives of Public Health (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- China
In The Last Decade
Die Fang
24 papers receiving 353 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Clinical Psychology 160
- Social Psychology 74
- Applied Psychology 15
- Biological Psychiatry 6
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 25
Countries citing papers authored by Die Fang
This map shows the geographic impact of Die Fang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Die Fang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Die Fang more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Die Fang
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Die Fang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Die Fang. The network helps show where Die Fang may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Die Fang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2022 | 62 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 44 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 35 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 28 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 26 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 19 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 16 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 16 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 15 | |
| 10 | 2022 | 15 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 14 | |
| 12 | 2023 | 11 | |
| 13 | 2023 | 9 | |
| 14 | 2022 | 9 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 16 | 2024 | 6 | |
| 17 | 2022 | 6 | |
| 18 | 2024 | 5 | |
| 19 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 20 | 2022 | 4 |
About Die Fang
Die Fang is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Speech and Hearing and Safety Research, having authored 27 papers that have together received 360 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (8 papers), Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (4 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (2 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (1 paper), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (1 paper), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (1 paper) and Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (160 citations), Social Psychology (74 citations), Applied Psychology (15 citations), Biological Psychiatry (6 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (25 citations). Die Fang has collaborated with scholars based in China. Frequent co-authors include Hailiang Ran, Yuanyuan Xiao, Yusan Che, Junwei Peng, Lin Chen, Jin Gui Lu, Hao Sun, Xiufeng Xu, Sifan Wang and Rui Wang. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Public Health, Journal of Affective Disorders, PeerJ, Frontiers in Psychiatry and Archives of Public Health.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.