DH Miller

2.0k citations
16 papers · 1.4k · 1 hit paper · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

DH Miller

16 papers receiving 1.4k citations

DH Miller's Hit Papers

Differential diagnosis of suspected multiple sclerosis: a consensus approach 2008 · 442 citations
4420+6+12Years since publication100200300400

Peers

DH Miller
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 895
  • Neurology 295
  • Rheumatology 197
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 239
  • Developmental Neuroscience 34
Replace H. J. Adèr with:
H. J. Adèr Netherlands
Anneke van der Walt Australia
Valerie L. Stevenson United Kingdom
Ruth Geraldes Portugal
Iordanis E. Evangelou United States
Steven D. Brass United States
G. T. Plant United Kingdom
Marios Yiannakas United Kingdom
William T. Shults United States
Waqar Rashid United Kingdom
DH Miller relative to H. J. Adèr Netherlands H. J. Adèr's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
H. J. Adèr · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by DH Miller

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of DH Miller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by DH Miller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites DH Miller more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by DH Miller

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by DH Miller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by DH Miller. The network helps show where DH Miller may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside DH Miller, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with DH Miller Line = papers co-authored together DH Miller links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1
Differential diagnosis of suspected multiple sclerosis: a consensus approach
Hit paper breakdown →
2008442
2 1999323
3 2016102
4 199778
5 200972
6 200867
7 201166
8 201043
9 200740
10 200738
11 200935
12 200834
13 201126
14 201015
15 201110
16 200710

About DH Miller

DH Miller is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Oncology, Rheumatology, Infectious Diseases and Organic Chemistry, having authored 16 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (14 papers), Polyomavirus and related diseases (2 papers), Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies (1 paper) and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (895 citations), Neurology (295 citations), Rheumatology (197 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (239 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (34 citations). DH Miller has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Alan J. Thompson, D. P. E. Kingsley, Robin Murray, O Föster, Vincent Kirkbride, Ann Stewart, Larry Rifkin, Shôn Lewis, P N Amess and I. F. Moseley. Their work appears in journals such as Multiple Sclerosis Journal, The Lancet and Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact