Denon Start

502 citations
26 papers · 318 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Denon Start

26 papers receiving 310 citations

Peers

Denon Start
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Ecological Modeling 50
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 126
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 187
  • Ecology 124
  • Insect Science 33
Replace Anna F. Probert with:
Anna F. Probert Switzerland
Maria J. Gołąb Poland
Claudine Dolt Switzerland
Lucas Neves Perillo Brazil
Carolina Nunes Liberal Brazil
Cari‐Ann M. Hickerson United States
Michelle F. DiLeo Canada
Fabio Germán Cupul‐Magaña Mexico
Mário Boieiro Portugal
Alix M. C. Sauve France
Denon Start relative to Anna F. Probert Switzerland Anna F. Probert's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×12.7×
Anna F. Probert · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Denon Start

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Denon Start's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Denon Start with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Denon Start more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Denon Start

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Denon Start. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Denon Start. The network helps show where Denon Start may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Denon Start, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Denon Start Line = papers co-authored together Denon Start links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201770
2 201941
3 201723
4 201923
5 201621
6 202018
7 201817
8 201715
9 201813
10 201712
11 20189
12 20199
13 20198
14 20175
15 20195
16 20205
17 20144
18 20204
19 20184
20 20173

About Denon Start

Denon Start is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecological Modeling, Insect Science and Genetics, having authored 26 papers that have together received 318 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (17 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (10 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (8 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (5 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (3 papers), Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (3 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (3 papers) and Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (50 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (126 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (187 citations), Ecology (124 citations) and Insect Science (33 citations). Denon Start has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Gilbert Benjamin, Matthew A. Barbour, Devin Kirk, Stephen P. De Lisle, Arthur E. Weis, Tess Nahanni Grainger, Douglas W. Morris, Martin Krkošek, Shannon J. McCauley and William D. Halliday. Their work appears in journals such as The American Naturalist, Oikos, Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, Ecology and Journal of Animal Ecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact