Denon Start

473 citations
24 papers · 290 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Denon Start

24 papers receiving 285 citations

Peers

Denon Start
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Ecological Modeling 49
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 115
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 170
  • Ecology 113
  • Insect Science 33
Replace Anna F. Probert with:
Anna F. Probert Switzerland
Rafael E. Cárdenas Ecuador
Lucas Neves Perillo Brazil
Enrique González‐Soriano Mexico
Karsten Hannig Germany
Kyle E. Coblentz United States
Michelle F. DiLeo Canada
Angela Chuang United States
Manette E. Sandor United States
Ángel Solís Costa Rica
Denon Start relative to Anna F. Probert Switzerland Anna F. Probert's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×12.7×
Anna F. Probert · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Denon Start

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Denon Start's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Denon Start with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Denon Start more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Denon Start

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Denon Start. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Denon Start. The network helps show where Denon Start may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Denon Start, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Denon Start Line = papers co-authored together Denon Start links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201765
2 201935
3 201721
4 201921
5 201618
6 202017
7 201816
8 201813
9 201713
10 201710
11 20188
12 20198
13 20198
14 20175
15 20205
16 20195
17 20144
18 20204
19 20184
20 20173

About Denon Start

Denon Start is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Genetics, Ecological Modeling and Ecology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 290 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (17 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (10 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (8 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (5 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (3 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (3 papers), Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (3 papers) and Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (49 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (115 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (170 citations), Ecology (113 citations) and Insect Science (33 citations). Denon Start has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Benjamin Gilbert, Matthew A. Barbour, Devin Kirk, Stephen P. De Lisle, Arthur E. Weis, Tess Nahanni Grainger, Douglas W. Morris, William D. Halliday, Martin Krkošek and Shannon J. McCauley. Their work appears in journals such as The American Naturalist, Oikos, Ecology, Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences and Journal of Animal Ecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact