Dennis Foster

2 papers and 218 indexed citations i.

About

Dennis Foster is a scholar working on Industrial relations, Aerospace Engineering and Paleontology. According to data from OpenAlex, Dennis Foster has authored 2 papers receiving a total of 218 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 0 papers in Industrial relations, 0 papers in Aerospace Engineering and 0 papers in Paleontology. Recurrent topics in Dennis Foster’s work include and . Dennis Foster is often cited by papers focused on and . Dennis Foster collaborates with scholars based in United States. Dennis Foster's co-authors include Donald Schwartz and Nina Schwartz and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Psychotherapy and Psychoanalysis Culture & Society.

In The Last Decade

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dennis Foster i

Fields of papers citing papers by Dennis Foster

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dennis Foster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dennis Foster. The network helps show where Dennis Foster may publish in the future.

Countries citing papers authored by Dennis Foster

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dennis Foster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dennis Foster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dennis Foster more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025