Dennis E. te Beest

36 papers receiving 746 citations

Peers

Dennis E. te Beest
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Modeling and Simulation 83
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 109
  • Small Animals 62
  • Otorhinolaryngology 30
  • Plant Science 232
Replace Elizabeth Newton with:
Elizabeth Newton United States
Matthieu Lesnoff France
Samuel O. Oyola Kenya
Saraya Tavornpanich Norway
A.W. Jalvingh Netherlands
Silvia Bertolini Italy
Melanie C. Melendrez United States
Anderson F. Brito Brazil
Hongguang Ren China
Dennis E. te Beest relative to Elizabeth Newton United States Elizabeth Newton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13.4×
Elizabeth Newton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dennis E. te Beest

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dennis E. te Beest's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dennis E. te Beest with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dennis E. te Beest more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dennis E. te Beest

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dennis E. te Beest. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dennis E. te Beest. The network helps show where Dennis E. te Beest may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dennis E. te Beest, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dennis E. te Beest Line = papers co-authored together Dennis E. te Beest links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200890
2 201364
3 202061
4 200944
5 202143
6 202230
7 201130
8 202030
9 202228
10 201026
11 201325
12 201622
13 201722
14 201321
15 201019
16 201418
17 202218
18 201017
19 201417
20 200414

About Dennis E. te Beest

Dennis E. te Beest is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Animal Science and Zoology, Epidemiology, Agronomy and Crop Science and Plant Science, having authored 39 papers that have together received 764 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Influenza Virus Research Studies (9 papers), Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (9 papers), COVID-19 epidemiological studies (5 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (5 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (5 papers), Fungal Plant Pathogen Control (4 papers), Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock (4 papers) and Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Modeling and Simulation (83 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (109 citations), Small Animals (62 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (30 citations) and Plant Science (232 citations). Dennis E. te Beest has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Frank van den Bosch, M. W. Shaw, Michiel van Boven, N. D. Paveley, Jacco Wallinga, Marion Koopmans, Arjan Stegeman, Carline van den Dool, Mariëtte Hooiveld and Mark A. van de Wiel. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Veterinary Science, PLoS ONE, Applied Animal Behaviour Science, Molecular Ecology Resources and Microbial Ecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact