Denna E. Washington

9 papers receiving 554 citations

Peers

Denna E. Washington
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 219
  • Hepatology 174
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 70
  • Physiology 126
  • Pharmacology 43
Replace C Praticò with:
C Praticò Italy
John C. Warden Australia
Mehmet Turan İnal Türkiye
Eva Boonen Belgium
Isabelle Nègre France
Peter M. Crean United Kingdom
Nafisseh Sirjani Warner United States
S. Baehrendtz Sweden
Paul Sporn Austria
B. K. Hutt United States
Denna E. Washington relative to C Praticò Italy C Praticò's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10.9×
C Praticò · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Denna E. Washington

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Denna E. Washington's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Denna E. Washington with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Denna E. Washington more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Denna E. Washington

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Denna E. Washington. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Denna E. Washington. The network helps show where Denna E. Washington may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Denna E. Washington, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Denna E. Washington Line = papers co-authored together Denna E. Washington links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 1992219
2 1993107
3 199390
4 199379
5 199260
6 199338
7
Intracranial pressure monitoring during liver transplant without venovenous bypass for fulminant hepatic failure.
19937
8 19911
9 19921

About Denna E. Washington

Denna E. Washington is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Hepatology, Surgery and Physiology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 602 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Thermal Regulation in Medicine (3 papers), Liver Disease and Transplantation (2 papers), Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (2 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (2 papers), Biomedical Research and Pathophysiology (1 paper), Thermoregulation and physiological responses (1 paper), Muscle and Compartmental Disorders (1 paper) and Neurological Complications and Syndromes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (219 citations), Hepatology (174 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (70 citations), Physiology (126 citations) and Pharmacology (43 citations). Denna E. Washington has collaborated with scholars based in United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Benjamin Merrifield, Joseph McGuire, Daniel I. Sessler, Marie Csete Prager, Azita Moayeri, James Hynson, Marc Schroeder, Kumar G. Belani, Steven D. Lidofsky and Bruce F. Scharschmidt. Their work appears in journals such as Anesthesiology, Journal of Applied Physiology, Anesthesia & Analgesia, Hepatology and PubMed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact