Denise Compera
Impact in
-
- Retinal and Macular Surgery
- Corneal surgery and disorders
- Ophthalmology top 5%
- Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders
- Traumatic Ocular and Foreign Body Injuries
Papers in
-
- Retinal and Macular Surgery 12
-
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders 4
- Intraocular Surgery and Lenses 3
- Co-authors
- Ricarda Gisela Schumann (12 shared papers)Wolfgang Johann Mayer (6 shared papers)Christos Haritoglou (5 shared papers)Armin Wolf (7 shared papers)Anselm Kampik (5 shared papers)Renate Scheler (2 shared papers)Markus M. Schaumberger (3 shared papers)Matteo Giuseppe Cereda (3 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Denise Compera
11 papers receiving 289 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 9
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 289
- Ophthalmology 74
- Neurology 25
- Structural Biology 1
- Molecular Biology 23
Countries citing papers authored by Denise Compera
This map shows the geographic impact of Denise Compera's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Denise Compera with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Denise Compera more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Denise Compera
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Denise Compera. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Denise Compera. The network helps show where Denise Compera may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 16 scholars most cited alongside Denise Compera, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 83 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 74 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 47 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 28 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 17 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 14 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 11 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 10 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 10 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 9 | |
| 11 | Progression of Lamellar Hole-Associated Epiretinal Proliferation and Retinal Changes in Lamellar Macular Holes during Long Time Follow-Up | 2017 | 1 |
| 12 | 2017 | 0 |
About Denise Compera
Denise Compera is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Ophthalmology, Neurology, Insect Science and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, having authored 12 papers that have together received 304 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal and Macular Surgery (12 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (4 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (3 papers) and Vascular Malformations Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (289 citations), Ophthalmology (74 citations), Neurology (25 citations), Structural Biology (1 citation) and Molecular Biology (23 citations). Denise Compera has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Ricarda Gisela Schumann, Wolfgang Johann Mayer, Christos Haritoglou, Armin Wolf, Anselm Kampik, Renate Scheler, Markus M. Schaumberger, Matteo Giuseppe Cereda, Ferdinando G. Bottoni and Siegfried Georg Priglinger. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Ophthalmology, Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, Retina, European Journal of Ophthalmology and British Journal of Ophthalmology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.