Dena Freeman

587 citations
34 papers · 320 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Dena Freeman

29 papers receiving 254 citations

Peers

Dena Freeman
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Religious studies 82
  • Archeology 9
  • Anthropology 40
  • Sociology and Political Science 143
  • General Social Sciences 11
Replace Jon Abbink with:
Jon Abbink Netherlands
Holger Weiss Finland
Frederick Quinn United States
René Otayek France
Wim VAN BINSBERGEN Netherlands
Leslie Bessant United States
Finn Fuglestad Norway
Michel Cahen France
Éric Morier-Genoud United Kingdom
Grant Evans Hong Kong
Dena Freeman relative to Jon Abbink Netherlands Jon Abbink's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.9×
Jon Abbink · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dena Freeman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dena Freeman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dena Freeman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dena Freeman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dena Freeman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dena Freeman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dena Freeman. The network helps show where Dena Freeman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Dena Freeman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dena Freeman Line = papers co-authored together Dena Freeman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201258
2
Peripheral People: The Excluded Minorities of Ethiopia
200339
3 201238
4
Pentecostalism and development : churches, NGOs and social change in Africa
201226
5 200215
6 201515
7 201312
8 200311
9 200411
10 201211
11 201711
12
Living on the edge : marginalised minorities of craftworkers, and hunters in southern Ethiopia
20019
13 20029
14 20189
15 20188
16 20197
17 20186
18 20134
19 20194
20 20003

About Dena Freeman

Dena Freeman is a scholar working on Religious studies, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Development and Anthropology, having authored 34 papers that have together received 320 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include African history and culture analysis (12 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (9 papers), Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies (7 papers), Globalization and political ideologies (3 papers), African Studies and Ethnography (3 papers), International Development and Aid (2 papers), International Relations and Foreign Policy (2 papers) and Christian Theology and Mission (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (82 citations), Archeology (9 citations), Anthropology (40 citations), Sociology and Political Science (143 citations) and General Social Sciences (11 citations). Dena Freeman has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, China and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Alula Pankhurst, Jon Abbink, David Turton and Laura Hammond. Their work appears in journals such as Global Policy, Northeast African Studies, Hau Journal of Ethnographic Theory, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute and The International Journal of African Historical Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact