Delia E. Smith

56 papers receiving 3.0k citations

Peers

Delia E. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 155
  • Pharmacy 321
  • Clinical Psychology 936
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 286
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 762
  • Reproductive Medicine 195
Replace Neville H. Golden with:
Neville H. Golden United States
Alexis Llewellyn United Kingdom
Fabian K. P. Yap Singapore
Caryl Gay United States
Sue Kim South Korea
Kenneth Y. C. Kwek Singapore
Mathieu Roelants Belgium
Deborah Brooks Nelson United States
Sheila Gahagan United States
U Jaeger Germany
Delia E. Smith relative to Neville H. Golden United States Neville H. Golden's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.3×
Neville H. Golden · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Delia E. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Delia E. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Delia E. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Delia E. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Delia E. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Delia E. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Delia E. Smith. The network helps show where Delia E. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Delia E. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Delia E. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Delia E. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000394
2 1997303
3 1994241
4 1994214
5 1994208
6 1998157
7 1989155
8 1999152
9 1997145
10 1992103
11 199688
12 199280
13 198679
14 199179
15 198174
16 199770
17 199163
18
Correlates and predictors of weight loss in young adults: the CARDIA study.
199661
19 199854
20 198749

About Delia E. Smith

Delia E. Smith is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pharmacy, Physiology and Hematology, having authored 60 papers that have together received 3.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (14 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (10 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (6 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (4 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (3 papers), Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (3 papers) and Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacy (321 citations), Clinical Psychology (936 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (286 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (762 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (195 citations). Delia E. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Cora Elizabeth Lewis, G. Terence Wilson, Pamela J. Schreiner, Marsha D. Marcus, David R. Jacobs, O. Dale Williams, Polly P. Kratt, Barbara S. McCrady, Rena R. Wing and Heather E. McCreath. Their work appears in journals such as Experimental Biology and Medicine, International Journal of Eating Disorders, American Journal of Epidemiology, Controlled Clinical Trials and Addictive Behaviors.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact