Debra King
Impact in
- Public Administration top 10%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Employment and Welfare Studies
- Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Papers in
-
- Employment and Welfare Studies 8
- Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes 3
-
- Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving 4
- Emotional Labor in Professions 3
- Co-authors
- Helena Flam (1 shared paper)Linda Isherwood (7 shared papers)Mary A. Luszcz (3 shared papers)Wei Zhang (3 shared papers)A Howe (2 shared papers)Jennene Greenhill (2 shared papers)Colin MacDougall (2 shared papers)Yvonne Wells (1 shared paper)
In The Last Decade
Debra King
32 papers receiving 608 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
- Public Administration 43
- General Health Professions 212
- Health 67
- Sociology and Political Science 286
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 9
Countries citing papers authored by Debra King
This map shows the geographic impact of Debra King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Debra King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Debra King more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Debra King
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Debra King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Debra King. The network helps show where Debra King may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Debra King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2007 | 154 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 55 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 52 | |
| 4 | 2006 | 39 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 39 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 37 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 35 | |
| 8 | The aged care workforce 2012: final report | 2013 | 34 |
| 9 | 2012 | 24 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 21 | |
| 11 | 2008 | 17 | |
| 12 | 2007 | 17 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 16 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 13 | |
| 15 | 2016 | 13 | |
| 16 | The Resilience and mental health and wellbeing of farm families experiencing climate variation in South Australia | 2009 | 13 |
| 17 | 2017 | 13 | |
| 18 | 2019 | 12 | |
| 19 | 2004 | 10 | |
| 20 | 2006 | 9 |
About Debra King
Debra King is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Demography, Health and Education, having authored 34 papers that have together received 666 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Employment and Welfare Studies (8 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (4 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (4 papers), Retirement, Disability, and Employment (3 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (3 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (3 papers), Emotional Labor in Professions (3 papers) and Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (43 citations), General Health Professions (212 citations), Health (67 citations), Sociology and Political Science (286 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (9 citations). Debra King has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Sweden and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Helena Flam, Linda Isherwood, Mary A. Luszcz, Wei Zhang, A Howe, Jennene Greenhill, Colin MacDougall, Yvonne Wells, Julie Ellis and Eileen Willis. Their work appears in journals such as Australian Journal of Social Issues, Journal of sociology, Ageing and Society, Journal of Aging & Social Policy and The International Journal of Aging and Human Development.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.