Debra Archer
Impact in
- Equine top 0.1%
- Veterinary Equine Medical Research
- Small Animals top 1%
- Animal health and immunology
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Jacques M. Lemire (4 shared papers)C. J. PROUDMAN (19 shared papers)Hans L. Spiegelberg (1 shared paper)Lucinda Beck (1 shared paper)Gina Pinchbeck (14 shared papers)Carolyn Kelly (5 shared papers)Shebl E. Salem (11 shared papers)Mercedes Ricote (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Equine Veterinary Journal (25 papers)Veterinary Record (7 papers)BMC Veterinary Research (5 papers)The Veterinary Journal (4 papers)The Journal of Immunology (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesEgypt
In The Last Decade
Debra Archer
83 papers receiving 2.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
- Equine 759
- Small Animals 359
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 734
- Agronomy and Crop Science 255
- Immunology 447
Countries citing papers authored by Debra Archer
This map shows the geographic impact of Debra Archer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Debra Archer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Debra Archer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Debra Archer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Debra Archer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Debra Archer. The network helps show where Debra Archer may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Debra Archer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 89 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1995 | 471 | |
| 2 | 1991 | 422 | |
| 3 | 2002 | 214 | |
| 4 | 2005 | 94 | |
| 5 | 2002 | 91 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 83 | |
| 7 | 1999 | 71 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 60 | |
| 9 | 2008 | 57 | |
| 10 | 1994 | 55 | |
| 11 | 1992 | 52 | |
| 12 | 2004 | 51 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 48 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 46 | |
| 15 | Entrapment of the small intestine in the epiploic foramen in horses: a retrospective analysis of 71 cases recorded between 1991 and 2001. | 2005 | 45 |
| 16 | 2001 | 43 | |
| 17 | 2008 | 42 | |
| 18 | 2011 | 42 | |
| 19 | 2013 | 39 | |
| 20 | 2006 | 38 |
About Debra Archer
Debra Archer is a scholar working on Equine, Surgery, Small Animals, Agronomy and Crop Science and Infectious Diseases, having authored 89 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Veterinary Equine Medical Research (38 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (7 papers), Vector-Borne Animal Diseases (6 papers), Viral Infections and Vectors (5 papers), Animal health and immunology (4 papers), Mosquito-borne diseases and control (4 papers), Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (3 papers) and Eosinophilic Esophagitis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Equine (759 citations), Small Animals (359 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (734 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (255 citations) and Immunology (447 citations). Debra Archer has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Egypt. Frequent co-authors include Jacques M. Lemire, C. J. PROUDMAN, Hans L. Spiegelberg, Lucinda Beck, Gina Pinchbeck, Carolyn Kelly, Shebl E. Salem, Mercedes Ricote, Robyn Cunard and Christopher K. Glass. Their work appears in journals such as Equine Veterinary Journal, Veterinary Record, BMC Veterinary Research, The Veterinary Journal and The Journal of Immunology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.