Deborah Goodwin
Impact in
- Equine top 0.2%
- Veterinary Equine Medical Research
- Small Animals top 0.5%
- Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Papers in
- Co-authors
- John W.S. Bradshaw (6 shared papers)Patricia A. Harris (11 shared papers)H.P.B. Davidson (10 shared papers)Asher Ornoy (1 shared paper)S. Edelstein (1 shared paper)Dina Noff (1 shared paper)Edward S. Redhead (7 shared papers)Matthew O. Parker (6 shared papers)
- Journals
- Applied Animal Behaviour Science (7 papers)Animal Welfare (3 papers)Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science (3 papers)Behavioural Brain Research (2 papers)Equine Veterinary Journal (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
Deborah Goodwin
39 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
- Equine 584
- Small Animals 574
- Animal Science and Zoology 244
- Genetics 605
- Speech and Hearing 110
Countries citing papers authored by Deborah Goodwin
This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah Goodwin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah Goodwin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah Goodwin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah Goodwin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah Goodwin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah Goodwin. The network helps show where Deborah Goodwin may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Deborah Goodwin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1978 | 296 | |
| 2 | 1997 | 128 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 114 | |
| 4 | 1996 | 103 | |
| 5 | 2005 | 82 | |
| 6 | 2002 | 64 | |
| 7 | 2007 | 58 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 56 | |
| 9 | 2009 | 54 | |
| 10 | 1996 | 54 | |
| 11 | 2008 | 52 | |
| 12 | 2007 | 47 | |
| 13 | 2008 | 45 | |
| 14 | 2005 | 44 | |
| 15 | 2006 | 44 | |
| 16 | 1999 | 40 | |
| 17 | 2011 | 36 | |
| 18 | 2004 | 34 | |
| 19 | 2009 | 29 | |
| 20 | Social contact in horses: implications for human-horse interactions | 2005 | 25 |
About Deborah Goodwin
Deborah Goodwin is a scholar working on Equine, Genetics, Small Animals, Animal Science and Zoology and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 44 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Veterinary Equine Medical Research (27 papers), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (14 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (12 papers), Muscle metabolism and nutrition (7 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (7 papers), Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (6 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (5 papers) and Sports Performance and Training (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Equine (584 citations), Small Animals (574 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (244 citations), Genetics (605 citations) and Speech and Hearing (110 citations). Deborah Goodwin has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include John W.S. Bradshaw, Patricia A. Harris, H.P.B. Davidson, Asher Ornoy, S. Edelstein, Dina Noff, Edward S. Redhead, Matthew O. Parker, S Wickens and Natalie Waran. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Animal Behaviour Science, Animal Welfare, Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, Behavioural Brain Research and Equine Veterinary Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.