Deborah E. Linder

33 papers receiving 574 citations

Peers

Deborah E. Linder
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Equine 71
  • Small Animals 310
  • Speech and Hearing 98
  • Genetics 374
  • Pharmacy 49
Replace Sarah Heath with:
Sarah Heath United Kingdom
Melissa Bain United States
Nienke Endenburg Netherlands
Nancy A. Dreschel United States
Federica Pirrone Italy
Hazel C Carney United States
Tony Buffington United States
K. Taylor United Kingdom
Claude Béata France
Debra F. Horwitz United States
Deborah E. Linder relative to Sarah Heath United Kingdom Sarah Heath's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Sarah Heath · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Deborah E. Linder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah E. Linder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah E. Linder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah E. Linder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah E. Linder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah E. Linder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah E. Linder. The network helps show where Deborah E. Linder may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Deborah E. Linder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Deborah E. Linder Line = papers co-authored together Deborah E. Linder links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013105
2 201769
3 201763
4 201446
5 201745
6
A model for clinical evaluation of perioperative analgesia in rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus).
201031
7 201730
8 201226
9 201023
10 201618
11 201617
12 202017
13 201516
14 201316
15 202115
16 201314
17 201610
18 20139
19 20217
20 20176

About Deborah E. Linder

Deborah E. Linder is a scholar working on Genetics, Small Animals, Speech and Hearing, Physiology and Equine, having authored 35 papers that have together received 623 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Human-Animal Interaction Studies (26 papers), Veterinary Medicine and Surgery (14 papers), Veterinary Practice and Education Studies (8 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (7 papers), Veterinary Equine Medical Research (6 papers), Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (3 papers), Infant Health and Development (3 papers) and Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Equine (71 citations), Small Animals (310 citations), Speech and Hearing (98 citations), Genetics (374 citations) and Pharmacy (49 citations). Deborah E. Linder has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Lisa M. Freeman, Megan K. Mueller, Kathryn E. Michel, Cailin R. Heinze, Marguerite E. O’Haire, Neil J. Grossman, Anjali Pawar, Mary Jo Gilmer, Amy McCullough and Valerie J. Parker. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Veterinary Science, Veterinary Clinics of North America Small Animal Practice, Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association and Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact