Dean Mook

752 citations
75 papers · 595 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Dean Mook

68 papers receiving 551 citations

Peers

Dean Mook
Comparison fields: 5 of 24
  • Aerospace Engineering 264
  • Control and Systems Engineering 190
  • Computational Mechanics 88
  • Civil and Structural Engineering 76
  • Artificial Intelligence 50
Replace Donald L. Kunz with:
Donald L. Kunz United States
Fu-Shang Wei United States
Joanne L. Walsh United States
Chetan Nichkawde United States
David A. Peters United States
Frank E. Eastep United States
Damir Vučina Croatia
Yves Govers Germany
Manfred Hajek Germany
Dean Mook relative to Donald L. Kunz United States Donald L. Kunz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.5×
Donald L. Kunz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dean Mook

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dean Mook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dean Mook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dean Mook more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dean Mook

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dean Mook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dean Mook. The network helps show where Dean Mook may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dean Mook, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dean Mook Line = papers co-authored together Dean Mook links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 75 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198887
2 200036
3 200933
4 198929
5 199226
6 199320
7 199219
8 199318
9 198117
10 200316
11 199214
12 200314
13 200713
14 199212
15 199011
16 201011
17 19749
18 19779
19 19919
20 19929

About Dean Mook

Dean Mook is a scholar working on Aerospace Engineering, Control and Systems Engineering, Computational Mechanics, Civil and Structural Engineering and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 75 papers that have together received 595 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Control Systems and Identification (18 papers), Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics (16 papers), Aeroelasticity and Vibration Control (14 papers), Structural Health Monitoring Techniques (8 papers), Target Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks (7 papers), Fluid dynamics and aerodynamics studies (5 papers), Aerospace Engineering and Control Systems (5 papers) and Vibration and Dynamic Analysis (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aerospace Engineering (264 citations), Control and Systems Engineering (190 citations), Computational Mechanics (88 citations), Civil and Structural Engineering (76 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (50 citations). Dean Mook has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Argentina and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include John L. Junkins, Michael J. Roemer, Ali Hasan Nayfeh, John L. Crassidis, Sergio Preidikman, Zhicun Wang, Osama A. Kandil, Niti Kammuang-lue, Phrut Sakulchangsatjatai and Pradit Terdtoon. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics, Nonlinear Dynamics, Journal of vibration and acoustics, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control and AIAA Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact