David Sweeting

1.1k citations
56 papers · 683 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

David Sweeting

51 papers receiving 589 citations

Peers

David Sweeting
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Public Administration 228
  • Urban Studies 111
  • Political Science and International Relations 337
  • Finance 55
  • Strategy and Management 64
Replace Carey Doberstein with:
Carey Doberstein Canada
Jack Wayne Meek United States
Chris Aulich Australia
Kurt M. Thurmaier United States
Carsten Herzberg France
Peter Bogason Denmark
Joris Voets Belgium
Eric S. Zeemering United States
Ivan Koprić Croatia
José Nederhand Netherlands
David Sweeting relative to Carey Doberstein Canada Carey Doberstein's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.5×
Carey Doberstein · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Sweeting

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Sweeting's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Sweeting with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Sweeting more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Sweeting

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Sweeting. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Sweeting. The network helps show where David Sweeting may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Sweeting, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Sweeting Line = papers co-authored together David Sweeting links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 56 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200680
2 201956
3 201353
4 200542
5 200438
6 200236
7 201031
8 200629
9 200728
10 199427
11 201424
12 201220
13 200319
14 202417
15 202116
16 200915
17 202213
18 201913
19
Directly Elected Mayors in Urban Governance: Impact and Practice
201713
20 201312

About David Sweeting

David Sweeting is a scholar working on Public Administration, Political Science and International Relations, Urban Studies, Media Technology and Finance, having authored 56 papers that have together received 683 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Public Policy and Administration Research (17 papers), Political Systems and Governance (9 papers), Urban Planning and Governance (7 papers), Local Government Finance and Decentralization (4 papers), European Union Policy and Governance (3 papers), E-Government and Public Services (3 papers), Political and Economic history of UK and US (3 papers) and Smart Cities and Technologies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (228 citations), Urban Studies (111 citations), Political Science and International Relations (337 citations), Finance (55 citations) and Strategy and Management (64 citations). David Sweeting has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Michael Haus, Robin Hambleton, Pieter‐Jan Klok, Björn Egner, Jan Erling Klausen, Colin Copus, Panagiotis Getimis, Hubert Heinelt, Joanna Howard and Thomas Bernward Fischer. Their work appears in journals such as Local Government Studies, Policy & Politics, Environment and Planning C Politics and Space, Public Administration Review and Parallel Computing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact