David Schramm

68 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

David Schramm
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Sensory Systems 182
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 490
  • Speech and Hearing 120
  • Neurology 100
  • Otorhinolaryngology 37
Replace Alexander Chern with:
Alexander Chern United States
Matthew Bromwich Canada
K. P. Gibbin United Kingdom
Regina Helena Garcia Martins Brazil
Karen A. Doherty United States
Stephen A. Falk United States
Libby J. Smith United States
Kevin Wong United States
Divya Sridhar United States
Lorraine C. Nnacheta United States
David Schramm relative to Alexander Chern United States Alexander Chern's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20.5×
Alexander Chern · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Schramm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Schramm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Schramm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Schramm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Schramm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Schramm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Schramm. The network helps show where David Schramm may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Schramm, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Schramm Line = papers co-authored together David Schramm links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 71 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200698
2 200788
3 201478
4 200272
5 201254
6 201445
7 201643
8 201440
9 201936
10
Can I Hear You? Sentiment Analysis on Medical Forums
201335
11 200934
12 200133
13 201932
14 200627
15 200327
16 202125
17 198923
18 200923
19 201223
20
Treatment of intractable Menière's disease with intratympanic gentamicin: review of the University of Ottawa experience.
199721

About David Schramm

David Schramm is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Speech and Hearing, Surgery, Sensory Systems and Neurology, having authored 71 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (24 papers), Noise Effects and Management (9 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (9 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (7 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (4 papers), Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining (3 papers), Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes (3 papers) and Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (182 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (490 citations), Speech and Hearing (120 citations), Neurology (100 citations) and Otorhinolaryngology (37 citations). David Schramm has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Elizabeth M. Fitzpatrick, Janet Olds, Marina Sokolova, JoAnne Whittingham, Heather Whittingham, Mark E. Boseley, Alan B. Storrow, Andrée Durieux-Smith, Sean P. Collins and Lisa Mielniczuk. Their work appears in journals such as Cochlear Implants International, Otology & Neurotology, International Journal of Audiology, PLoS ONE and Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact