David Schmid

41 papers receiving 552 citations

Peers

David Schmid
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 421
  • History and Philosophy of Science 59
  • Artificial Intelligence 315
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 107
  • Literature and Literary Theory 64
Replace Klaas Landsman with:
Klaas Landsman Netherlands
Dean Rickles Australia
Alexei Grinbaum France
Harry Paul Germany
David J. Baker United States
Sandro Sozzo United Kingdom
Nick Herbert United States
Jan Faye Denmark
Laura Ruetsche United States
David Schmid relative to Klaas Landsman Netherlands Klaas Landsman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×9.1×
Klaas Landsman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Schmid

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Schmid's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Schmid with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Schmid more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Schmid

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Schmid. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Schmid. The network helps show where David Schmid may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Schmid, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Schmid Line = papers co-authored together David Schmid links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201881
2 200545
3 202044
4 201840
5 202039
6 202234
7 202325
8 199524
9 201924
10 202222
11 202020
12 202320
13 202318
14 202312
15 202411
16 202410
17 201210
18 20249
19 20238
20 20248

About David Schmid

David Schmid is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Artificial Intelligence, Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science and Cultural Studies, having authored 48 papers that have together received 582 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum Mechanics and Applications (25 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (20 papers), Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture (7 papers), Crime and Detective Fiction Studies (7 papers), Crime, Deviance, and Social Control (7 papers), Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (6 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (6 papers) and Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (421 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (59 citations), Artificial Intelligence (315 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (107 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (64 citations). David Schmid has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Poland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Robert W. Spekkens, Elie Wolfe, John H. Selby, Ana Belén Sainz, Francesco Buscemi, Denis Rosset, Matthew Leifer, Ravi Kunjwal, Matthew F. Pusey and Matty J. Hoban. Their work appears in journals such as Quantum, Physical review. A, Physical Review Letters, Literature film quarterly and Journal of Modern Optics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact