David Mitchell
Impact in
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 10%
- Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
- Communication top 10%
- Social Media and Politics
- Media Studies and Communication
Papers in
-
- Black Holes and Theoretical Physics 2
- Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies 2
- Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions 1
-
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories 2
- Co-authors
- Neil Turok (3 shared papers)Eric W. Rothenbuhler (1 shared paper)David E. Crowley (1 shared paper)Bo Sundborg (2 shared papers)Christian Roth (2 shared papers)D. M. Hogarth (1 shared paper)F. J. Cook (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Nuclear Physics B (3 papers)Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews (1 paper)Physical Review Letters (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
David Mitchell
7 papers receiving 346 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 180
- Communication 73
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 155
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 50
- Condensed Matter Physics 33
Countries citing papers authored by David Mitchell
This map shows the geographic impact of David Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Mitchell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Mitchell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Mitchell. The network helps show where David Mitchell may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside David Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1995 | 176 | |
| 2 | 1987 | 101 | |
| 3 | 1987 | 86 | |
| 4 | 1990 | 18 | |
| 5 | Nitrogen losses via subsurface flow from sugar cane on floodplain soils in the Australian wet tropics. | 2000 | 10 |
| 6 | 1991 | 6 | |
| 7 | The dynamics of a shallow perched watertable on a heavy soil in the Lower Herbert Valley | 2001 | 2 |
About David Mitchell
David Mitchell is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Soil Science, having authored 7 papers that have together received 399 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (2 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (2 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (2 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (1 paper), Sugarcane Cultivation and Processing (1 paper), Soil erosion and sediment transport (1 paper), Scientific Research and Discoveries (1 paper) and Quantum Mechanics and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (180 citations), Communication (73 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (155 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (50 citations) and Condensed Matter Physics (33 citations). David Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Neil Turok, Eric W. Rothenbuhler, David E. Crowley, Bo Sundborg, Christian Roth, D. M. Hogarth and F. J. Cook. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Physics B, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews and Physical Review Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.