David Meadows

46 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

David Meadows
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Ophthalmology 247
  • Pharmaceutical Science 161
  • Ocean Engineering 316
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 541
  • Molecular Medicine 65
Replace Xuemei Liang with:
Xuemei Liang United States
Meghali Bora Singapore
Hannah S. Leese United Kingdom
Laura Moore United States
Anne Fuchs Germany
Heather A. W. St John Australia
Natalie Wisniewski United States
Tao Tang China
Pola Goldberg Oppenheimer United Kingdom
David Meadows relative to Xuemei Liang United States Xuemei Liang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×21.6×
Xuemei Liang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Meadows

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Meadows's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Meadows with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Meadows more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Meadows

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Meadows. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Meadows. The network helps show where David Meadows may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Meadows, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Meadows Line = papers co-authored together David Meadows links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996170
2 1994102
3 2004100
4 198899
5 200388
6 200672
7 200463
8 200861
9 198352
10 201346
11 201245
12
A novel method to evaluate residence time in humans using a nonpenetrating fluorescent tracer.
200244
13 200935
14 200529
15 201323
16 198420
17 199419
18 200818
19 199317
20 200916

About David Meadows

David Meadows is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Mechanical Engineering, Ophthalmology, Ocean Engineering and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 46 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (19 papers), Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis (9 papers), Drilling and Well Engineering (7 papers), Corneal Surgery and Treatments (6 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (4 papers), Surfactants and Colloidal Systems (4 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (4 papers) and Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (247 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (161 citations), Ocean Engineering (316 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (541 citations) and Molecular Medicine (65 citations). David Meadows has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Hazim Abass, Howard A. Ketelson, Ralph Stone, Jerry R. Paugh, Nikolaos A. Peppas, Mike Christensen, Andrew L. Nguyen, Robert Pelton, Ruth A. Rosenthal and R L Schlitzer. Their work appears in journals such as Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Langmuir, Eye & Contact Lens Science & Clinical Practice, Current Eye Research and Journal of Colloid and Interface Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact