David McMenemy

1.2k citations
83 papers · 791 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

David McMenemy

74 papers receiving 638 citations

Peers

David McMenemy
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Library and Information Sciences 342
  • Communication 146
  • Information Systems 229
  • Information Systems and Management 60
  • Conservation 26
Replace Philip Hider with:
Philip Hider Australia
R. David Lankes United States
Rita Marcella United Kingdom
Lynne McKechnie Canada
Karen E. Pettigrew United States
G.E. Gorman New Zealand
Tom Dobrowolski United Kingdom
Snunith Shoham Israel
Gunilla Widén Finland
Crystal Fulton Ireland
David McMenemy relative to Philip Hider Australia Philip Hider's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Philip Hider · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David McMenemy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David McMenemy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David McMenemy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David McMenemy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David McMenemy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David McMenemy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David McMenemy. The network helps show where David McMenemy may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside David McMenemy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David McMenemy Line = papers co-authored together David McMenemy links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 83 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013129
2 200652
3 200852
4 200433
5 200628
6 201226
7 201125
8 201323
9 200922
10 201221
11 202219
12 201017
13 201917
14 200715
15 201814
16 200714
17 201313
18 202212
19 200712
20 200711

About David McMenemy

David McMenemy is a scholar working on Library and Information Sciences, Sociology and Political Science, Information Systems, Communication and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 83 papers that have together received 791 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Library Science and Administration (37 papers), Library Science and Information Literacy (15 papers), Web and Library Services (13 papers), Social Media and Politics (8 papers), Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (8 papers), Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (5 papers), Freedom of Expression and Defamation (4 papers) and Irish and British Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (342 citations), Communication (146 citations), Information Systems (229 citations), Information Systems and Management (60 citations) and Conservation (26 citations). David McMenemy has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Chile and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ian Ruthven, Alan Poulter, Gobinda Chowdhury, Steven Buchanan, Margaret E. Greene, Graeme Brown, Lauren Smith, Christine Gallagher, Helen Pickering and Ian Ferguson. Their work appears in journals such as Library Review, Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, Journal of Documentation, Online Information Review and Government Information Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact