David J. Chivers

66 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers

David J. Chivers
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
  • Developmental Biology 809
  • Social Psychology 1.9k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1.1k
  • Ecology 982
  • Paleontology 276
Replace Alison F. Richard with:
Alison F. Richard United States
Robert W. Sussman United States
Annie Gautier‐Hion France
Michel Fernandez Gabon
Kevin D. Hunt United States
John F. Oates United States
Elizabeth A. Williamson United Kingdom
Gottfried Hohmann Germany
Patrícia Izar Brazil
Dietmar Zinner Germany
David J. Chivers relative to Alison F. Richard United States Alison F. Richard's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Alison F. Richard · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David J. Chivers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David J. Chivers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David J. Chivers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David J. Chivers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David J. Chivers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David J. Chivers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David J. Chivers. The network helps show where David J. Chivers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David J. Chivers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David J. Chivers Line = papers co-authored together David J. Chivers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 70 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1980366
2 2013281
3
The siamang in Malaya. A field study of a primate in tropical rain forest.
1974184
4 1984173
5 1985171
6
Food Acquisition and Processing in Primates
1984163
7 1969136
8 1995123
9 198097
10 198283
11 201067
12 199361
13 200258
14 197655
15 197553
16 199852
17 200350
18 200747
19 200344
20 200738

About David J. Chivers

David J. Chivers is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Ecology, Developmental Biology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Genetics, having authored 70 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Primate Behavior and Ecology (41 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (25 papers), Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (15 papers), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (6 papers), Evolution and Paleontology Studies (4 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (4 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (4 papers) and Bat Biology and Ecology Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Biology (809 citations), Social Psychology (1.9k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.1k citations), Ecology (982 citations) and Paleontology (276 citations). David J. Chivers has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Indonesia and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Claude Marcel Hladik, Bernard Wood, Alan Bilsborough, Kim R. McConkey, Holger Preuschoft, H. N. Southern, P. Langer, Mark E. Harrison, Helen C. Morrogh‐Bernard and Nancy Marusha Creel. Their work appears in journals such as Oryx, Folia Primatologica, International Journal of Primatology, Journal of Tropical Ecology and Primates.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact