David Hacker

537 citations
22 papers · 315 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

David Hacker

22 papers receiving 301 citations

Peers

David Hacker
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 197
  • Clinical Psychology 80
  • Applied Psychology 12
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 25
  • Social Psychology 20
Replace Nicholas R. Morrison with:
Nicholas R. Morrison United States
Stephanie Deighton Canada
Alison V. James United States
M. Aghevli United States
Frances E. Deavers United States
Ian Lowens United Kingdom
Terje Torgersen Norway
Alexandra Walker Australia
Thomas A. Crum United States
Teresa Sánchez‐Gutiérrez Spain
David Hacker relative to Nicholas R. Morrison United States Nicholas R. Morrison's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Nicholas R. Morrison · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Hacker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Hacker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Hacker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Hacker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Hacker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Hacker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Hacker. The network helps show where David Hacker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Hacker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Hacker Line = papers co-authored together David Hacker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201272
2 201866
3 200845
4 201837
5 202318
6
Problematic and Risk Behaviours in Psychosis: A Shared Formulation Approach
201012
7 201212
8 20097
9 20227
10 20096
11 20095
12 20105
13 20184
14 20234
15 20133
16 20163
17 20202
18 20202
19 20232
20 20171

About David Hacker

David Hacker is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Epidemiology, Clinical Psychology, Applied Psychology and Philosophy, having authored 22 papers that have together received 315 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (10 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (8 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (3 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (2 papers), Psychological Testing and Assessment (2 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (1 paper), Hallucinations in medical conditions (1 paper) and Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (197 citations), Clinical Psychology (80 citations), Applied Psychology (12 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (25 citations) and Social Psychology (20 citations). David Hacker has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, China and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Alan Meaden, Christopher Allen Jones, Claire B Irving, Irene Cormac, Chunhu Shi, Jun Xia, Jue Chen, Sai Zhao, Jeremy A. Tudway and Max J. Birchwood. Their work appears in journals such as Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Schizophrenia Bulletin, Journal of Mental Health, Neurocase and International Journal of Molecular Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact