David Gooding

1.9k citations
55 papers · 845 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

David Gooding

50 papers receiving 691 citations

Peers

David Gooding
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
  • History and Philosophy of Science 341
  • General Psychology 32
  • Theoretical Computer Science 12
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 132
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 99
Replace Harold I. Brown with:
Harold I. Brown United States
Arthur I. Miller United Kingdom
Jeffrey S. Poland United States
David Topper Canada
Galileo Galilei United States
Paul Hoyningen‐Huene Germany
James H. Fetzer United States
Thomas Nickles United States
Richard S. Westfall United States
Frederik Stjernfelt Denmark
David Gooding relative to Harold I. Brown United States Harold I. Brown's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Harold I. Brown · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Gooding

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Gooding's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Gooding with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Gooding more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Gooding

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Gooding. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Gooding. The network helps show where David Gooding may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Gooding, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Gooding Line = papers co-authored together David Gooding links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1990249
2
The Uses of Experiment
1992103
3 198539
4 200638
5 199231
6 200430
7 199028
8 198627
9 200924
10 198119
11 196818
12 198517
13 199614
14 200414
15 199113
16 198213
17 201912
18 200412
19 199410
20 19809

About David Gooding

David Gooding is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Molecular Biology, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 55 papers that have together received 845 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (19 papers), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (6 papers), History and advancements in chemistry (5 papers), History of Science and Natural History (5 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (4 papers), Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (4 papers), History of Science and Medicine (4 papers) and Spacecraft Design and Technology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (341 citations), General Psychology (32 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (12 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (132 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (99 citations). David Gooding has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Trevor Pinch, Simon Schaffer, Frank A. J. L. James, Ryan D. Tweney, Martin J. Booth, Geoffrey Cantor, Karen M. Hampson, R. J. Cole, Michael E. Gorman and Michael Faraday. Their work appears in journals such as The British Journal for the History of Science, Foundations of Science, Isis, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A and Creativity Research Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact