David Gallop

742 citations
31 papers · 317 · h-index 10

Impact in

  • Philosophy top 2%
    • Classical Philosophy and Thought
    • Medieval and Classical Philosophy
    • Philosophical Ethics and Theory
    • Classical Antiquity Studies

Papers in

David Gallop

23 papers receiving 218 citations

Peers

David Gallop
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Philosophy 185
  • Anthropology 105
  • History and Philosophy of Science 40
  • Archeology 72
  • Classics 11
Replace Rosamond Kent Sprague with:
Rosamond Kent Sprague United States
Charlotte L. Stough United States
Theodor Ebert Germany
James H. Lesher United States
Heraclitus
Michael V. Wedin United States
William Charlton United Kingdom
J. Dybikowski Canada
Norman Gulley United Kingdom
John Peter Anton United States
David Gallop relative to Rosamond Kent Sprague United States Rosamond Kent Sprague's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.6×
Rosamond Kent Sprague · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Gallop

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Gallop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Gallop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Gallop more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Gallop

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Gallop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Gallop. The network helps show where David Gallop may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside David Gallop, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Gallop Line = papers co-authored together David Gallop links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 196769
2 198747
3 198728
4 198223
5
Aristotle on sleep and dreams : a text and translation with introduction, notes and glossary
199021
6 201619
7 196016
8 196416
9 199915
10 199615
11 19637
12
Defence of Socrates ; Euthyphro ; Crito
19976
13 19616
14 19885
15 19924
16 19763
17 20032
18 19652
19 19672
20 19692

About David Gallop

David Gallop is a scholar working on Philosophy, Anthropology, Archeology, Literature and Literary Theory and Law, having authored 31 papers that have together received 317 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Philosophy and Thought (21 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (5 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (3 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (2 papers), Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management (1 paper), Complex Systems and Decision Making (1 paper), Philosophy, Science, and History (1 paper) and Construction Project Management and Performance (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (185 citations), Anthropology (105 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (40 citations), Archeology (72 citations) and Classics (11 citations). David Gallop has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Alvin W. Gouldner, George E. Owen, Martha C. Nussbaum, David John Furley, Aristotle , B C Plato, David Lester, Gail Fine, David W. Hamlyn and Edward Hussey. Their work appears in journals such as Phoenix, Philosophy and literature, The Philosophical Review, Phronesis and The Philosophical Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact